Yes, I mean this identification. The tools would have button like "needs review by expert" which would have similar effect like "skip" but the edit would be enqueued somewhere so that experts could review it later and revert in case if it wasn't correct.
Only task what would need to be done by a bot or so would be clean up of this list (categorizing of edits etc). For example I know something about computers, but definitely not about geography or history. So I could just list all "suspicious edits" for pages in category "information technology" and revert / confirm as OK all edits in it (or those I know). While someone else, who is for example expert on geography could review these edits where someone for example changed the size / population added some dubious or weird content about some country, which I can't confirm is wrong neither correct myself. These days I am testing huggle 3 as I am working on it (even on production, shame on me) thus I get in a role of "vandal fighter". And I can tell you that every day I skip hundreds of edits which I personally think that should be reviewed by someone because they looked weird to me, but which I didn't revert because I couldn't confirm it was vandalism either. Having evidence of such edits would help us not overlook these changes. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
