What I described are flagged revs the other way. Is it possible to enable them in reverse-mode so that all edits are flagged as good, but editors can flag them as bad? If not, I can't see how it could be useful for this purpose...
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Bartosz Dziewoński <matma....@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:51:34 +0200, Petr Bena <benap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> We are getting somewhere else than I wanted... I didn't want to >> discuss what should be reverted on sight or not. Problem is that right >> now lot of vandal-fighters see certain amount of dubious edits they >> skip because they can't verify if they are correct or not, which are >> then ignored and get lost in editing history. That's a fact. This >> problem could be easily solved if these specific edits could be >> highlighted somehow so that they would get attention of people who >> understand the topic well enough to check if they are OK. But there is >> no such a system / mechanism that would allow us to do that. I think >> this is worth of implementing somehow because it could significantly >> improve the reliability of encyclopedia content. There is a lot of >> vandalism that remains unnoticed even for months > > > Really, you have just described FlaggedRevs. It could be enabled by default > for all articles and would solve all of your problems. Many large Wikipedias > already use it, including pl.wp and de.wp. > > > -- > Matma Rex > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
