> If you use Huggle and see something ok (= not to be reverted), Huggle must mark it patrolled; if you're unsure, you should be able to tell so to Huggle and it will be left unpatrolled.
This is not the same. Surely, most edits would appear in such an "unpatrolled" list. Most edits are not seen by Huggle users. We'd instead be looking for a list of edits that were seen by Huggle users, not reverted, but also not patrolled. > just store somewhere the suspect list Where? How will others access the list? On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemow...@gmail.com>wrote: > All this is unnecessary complication. If you use Huggle and see something > ok (= not to be reverted), Huggle must mark it patrolled; if you're unsure, > you should be able to tell so to Huggle and it will be left unpatrolled. > > If you're emotionally attached to the idea of doing the opposite, you can > still do so with patrolled edits: just store somewhere the suspect list and > periodically mark as patrolled all the edits at the bottom of the queue > (say, $wgRCMaxAge - 72 h) for manual revision. > > Nemo > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l> > _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
