On 4/8/14, S Page <[email protected]> wrote:
> In https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/124475/ (go back to sans-serif)
> Legoktm claims "There was a consensus that listing only non-free fonts was
> not acceptable", that's not my recollection.  Was a bug ever filed?
>
> Kaldari valiantly tried to put non-free fonts first, that caused bug
> 63512.  Now as I understand it, we're back to:
> * Mac users get Helvetica Neue
> * Windows users get Arial unless they have Helvetica Neue (unlikely) or
> Helvetica (I can't reproduce bug 63662)
> * Linux users get whatever F/OSS font fontconfig supplies for the
> well-known string "Helvetica", I get Nimbus Sans L
> * Android users ?? (Nobody responded.)
>
> quoting Isarra Yos
>
>
>> Given that no objective and verifiable issues with this were ever provided
>> ... Why? All this effort, and for what?
>>
>
> BECAUSE DESIGN. (I begged and pleaded with the talented designers who work
> next to me to put something emphatic in the Typography refresh FAQ.) It's a
> better design. It makes MediaWiki web sites look better for millions of our
> users by mentioning proprietary fonts that 90+% of them have. That's not
> "objective and verifiable", it just is. Is it worth mentioning non-free
> fonts?  People disagree. But I'm saddened by the implicit and overt
> hostility towards the art of design here ("its debatable whether this
> actually represents "progress"",

How is that hostile to the "art of design". I have no problem with
what the typo refresh project set out to do. I have a problem with
what it actually did. I'm totally fine with the "art of design" as an
abstract idea and I agree with 3 of the 4 stated requirements of Typo
refresh (neutral on the consistency requirement).

> "it seems like things have shifted more to
> managers at WMF make the decisions", etc.).

To clarify I never said that was necessarily a bad thing. Maybe it is,
maybe it isn't. All I'm saying is that seems to be the direction we're
heading. Heck in the context I was arguing for the side of typography
refresh...

--bawolff

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Reply via email to