On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Daniel Friesen <[email protected]> wrote: > I never liked this, over and over I point out a fatal issue with a > commit sometimes fundamental to the idea itself and impossible to fix, > so I -1 it, then when a new patchset comes out, completely ignores the > concerns I've pointed out, my -1 with the idea suddenly disappears as if > the changeset was supposed to fix it.
That's what -2 is for. I think this is a social issue: we need to stop thinking of -2'ing a patch as a grave statement of disapproval. It should have a meaning matching its function: that is, a "sticky" -1 that isn't cleared automatically by a new revision. --scott -- (http://cscott.net) _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
