On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Matthew Flaschen <[email protected]> wrote:
> There is consensus at > > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Code_of_conduct_for_technical_spaces/Draft#Next_steps > that the best way to finalize the CoC draft is to focus on a few > sections at once (while still allowing people to comment on other > ones). This allows progress without requiring people to monitor all > sections at once and lets us separate the questions of “what are our > goals here?” and “how should this work?”. After these sections are > finalized, I recommend minimizing or avoiding later substantive > changes to them. > > The first sections being finalized are the intro (text before the > Principles section), Principles, and Unacceptable behavior. These > have been discussed on the talk page for the last two weeks, and > appear to have stabilized. > > However, there may still be points that need to be refined. Please > participate in building consensus on final versions of these sections: > > * > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Talk:Code_of_conduct_for_technical_spaces/Draft > > * > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Code_of_conduct_for_technical_spaces/Draft > > If you are not comfortable contributing to this discussion under your > name or a pseudonym, you can email your feedback or suggestions to > [email protected] . Quim Gil, Frances Hocutt, and > Kalliope Tsouroupidou will be monitoring this address and will > anonymously bring the points raised into the discussion at your > request. > > lol, consensus among whom, to what? i am against it (i'd love to send the reasons in another mail though), do i count, and it is still consensus? probably not, because i did maybe two unimportant commits for kiwix. i would prefer if you would be so kind to define one measurable criteria for the question "do we need a code of conduct", no matter if entry or success criteria. e.g * 50 volunteers from different part of the world saying that we need it * 20% of committers want it * after one year 20% more volunteer commits are done other critieria like "people attending conferences", or "mails written" would be a bad idea, as the goal is to have more contributions, not more conference tourists or mailing list tourists. what you think, matt, or quim ? best, rupert _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
