Strainu and Pine: If developers learn they can't trust you to distinguish reasonable expectations from unreasonable ones (this falls into the "ludicrously unreasonable" category, by the way), don't be surprised if they ultimately start to doubt even your legitimate complaints.
There are very important discussions to be had about how software development works in the Wikimedia movement. This is absolutely not one of them. On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 1:48 AM, Strainu <[email protected]> wrote: > 2016-12-12 10:21 GMT+02:00 Quim Gil <[email protected]>: > > Hi, let me check this incident under the light of the Technical > > Collaboration Guideline > > <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Technical_Collaboration_Guideline> > (draft > > under review, feedback welcome in the related discussion pages). > > > > https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Technical_Collaboration_ > Guideline/Milestone_communication > > defines when and where are communications expected. > > Thank you for the pragmatic approach Quim. I launched 2 discussions > there, referring to changes that require action from the communities > [1] and changes affecting large number of pages [2]. Hopefully we can > find a middle ground on at least some of the subjects. > > Strainu > > [1] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:Th1vs3h97d96ajaf > [2] https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Topic:Th1wc4pu1qplo4k8 > > _______________________________________________ > Wikitech-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l > -- Neil P. Quinn <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Neil_P._Quinn-WMF>, product analyst Wikimedia Foundation _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
