On 19 May 2005 at 19:44, Stephen Bird wrote: > So, it seems to me, a simple solution would be to store the data in encrypted > form so that any loss would be reduced/eliminated. > > On Thu, 19 May 2005 19:00:02 -0400, Bernie wrote: > > >I think you're misunderstanding what the problem here is: the data wasn't > >corrupted and so no-longer available... but that the media it was one > >have vanished -- presumably the tapes/disks/cartridges/whatever are still > >readable and still easily accessible... only who knows whose hands > >they're in... > > On 19 May 2005 at 23:24, Kylde wrote: > > >> in my (limited) experience with big cos. thay know enough not to make > >> this the ONLY physical copy of the data, and accidents happen > > RichK wrote: > > >> > And yet, we can't seem to go a week without some company reporting > >> > another -- usually boneheaded -- data loss.
That's right, only precious few folk do that... /b\ -- Bernie Cosell Fantasy Farm Fibers mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Pearisburg, VA --> Too many people, too few sheep <-- -- ---------------------------------------- The WIN-HOME list is hosted on a Windows 2000(TM) machine running L-Soft international's LISTSERV(R) software. To unsubscribe, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you have questions about the list, write to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
