As for me, IMHO, I like the OE process, i.e. new response at the top with the original email below with > (if configured that way.)
WRT > Apparently MSFT feels that top posting is the best even tho it > messes up quoting of the original & placement of a signature. I delete what does not apply in the original and if necessary cut & pasted with the ">" in my response if necessary. Or sometimes state "responses in original email below." And my signature is <G: Also see below. (for those non-OE users...my response is the one without the ">" ) Daniel Wysocki Twin*.*Computers Fast Reliable Wallet-Friendly ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wayne Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 11:15 AM Subject: Re: About quoting in general... WAS: Re: batteries for wireless > At 12:49 PM 7/27/2005, RichK typed: > >Maybe folks closer to M$ can explain why OE behaves that way. > > Outlook also behaves in a similar manner & as to why I don't believe anyone > knows. Apparently MSFT feels that top posting is the best even tho it > messes up quoting of the original & placement of a signature. Such > questions have been asked of MSFT many times & I don't think anyone has > gotten an answer that satisfies them. > > Because of this & not being able to do selective quoting when replying are > the reasons why I can't bring myself to use anything MSFT for email even > tho I've tried many timesaddresses are required. BTW check you spell checker... "timesaddresses" is not a real word. <VBG> -- ---------------------------------------- To Change your email Address for this list, send the following message: CHANGE WIN-HOME your_old_address your_new_address to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note carefully that both old and new addresses are required.
