Andy Medina wrote:
On Sat, 5 Aug 2006, Pete Holsberg wrote:
This stems from a discussion I've been having with the so-called IT
person at my wife's employer, a small non-profit, who is a buzzword
grabber and who has decided that all of the computers at the soup
kitchen should have XP Pro rather than Home. They have no servers and
no Active Directory thingies and don't even use file- or
print-sharing! And she decided that being able to changes the reserved
bandwidth is a compelling reason for XP Pro.
None of the above have anything to do (directly) with QoS.
True. Has to do with XP Pro vs Home, as I thought I said. :-)
QoS has to do
with QoS-aware apps/protocols and QoS-aware hardware working together in
QoS-type situations. [Good luck getting that clarified. :) ]
Besides QoS is generally considered to be a *good* thing !
I've been trying to find out (1) by whom and (2) for what!
--
Pete Holsberg
Columbus, NJ
"Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish."
-- Euripides
--
----------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is your picture included in the Official Win-Home List Members Profiles Page?
http://www.besteffort.com/winhome/Profiles.html
If not, write to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
