On Sun, 6 Aug 2006, Pete Holsberg wrote:
Andy Medina wrote:
None of the above have anything to do (directly) with QoS.
True. Has to do with XP Pro vs Home, as I thought I said. :-)
XP Pro vs Home has *nothing* to do with QoS. XP Pro vs Home
does apply to your active directory thoughts though.
QoS has to do with QoS-aware apps/protocols and QoS-aware
hardware working together in QoS-type situations. [Good luck
getting that clarified. :) ]
Besides QoS is generally considered to be a *good* thing !
I've been trying to find out (1) by whom and (2) for what!
1) By the "committee" that approved the QoS RFC?
2) The "for what" has been described in several posts on this
thread.
--
----------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is your picture included in the Official Win-Home List Members Profiles Page?
http://www.besteffort.com/winhome/Profiles.html
If not, write to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
