On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Larry Marshall wrote: > Isn't this a Linux problem, not a Win4Lin problem? I had an inciteful > dialog ... i'm hoping you really meant "insightful" here. :-) unless you were being very freudian. rday _______________________________________________ Win4Lin-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.netraverse.com/mailman/listinfo/win4lin-users
- Re: [Win4Lin-users] Re: Upgrade polic... Philip Rhoades
- Re: [Win4Lin-users] Re: Upgrade polic... Larry Marshall
- Re: [Win4Lin-users] Re: Upgrade polic... j . logsdon
- Re: [Win4Lin-users] Re: Upgrade polic... Larry Marshall
- Re: [Win4Lin-users] Re: Upgrade polic... Chris Semple
- Re: [Win4Lin-users] Re: Upgrade polic... Hoyt
- Re: [Win4Lin-users] Re: Upgrade polic... Chris Semple
- [Win4Lin-users] Room for improvement Andrew T Chan
- Re: [Win4Lin-users] Room for improvem... Richard Bass
- Re: [Win4Lin-users] Re: Upgrade polic... Larry Marshall
- Re: [Win4Lin-users] Re: Upgrade polic... rpjday
- Re: [Win4Lin-users] Re: Upgrade polic... Chris Semple
- Re: [Win4Lin-users] Re: Upgrade polic... Larry Marshall
- Re: [Win4Lin-users] Re: Upgrade polic... Larry Marshall
- Re: [Win4Lin-users] Win4lin 2.0 - The Upgrade Policy would... Hoyt
- Re: [Win4Lin-users] Win4lin 2.0 - The Upgrade Policy ... Larry Marshall
- Re: [Win4Lin-users] Win4lin 2.0 - The Upgrade Policy ... Richard Bass
- Re: [Win4Lin-users] Win4lin 2.0 - The Upgrade Pol... Larry Marshall
