Re: [Win4Lin-users] W4L and the 2.4.x kernel ...?

[Dave Gardner]

At 10:38 AM 2/22/01 -0600, you wrote:
>I am running 2.2.x and 2.4 on different machines, in general both give a
>standard (not the most sophisticated) user more than 90% of what they
>need. As a user I rather see stable product as time is precious, a
>bleeding edge user should probably not bother with anything associated
>with Windows.

It's too simplistic to call it a matter of being "bleeding edge". Some of 
us actually need the stateful firewalling that we get with iptables in 
kernels => 2.4.0. And I personally don't understand the leap of logic in 
your last sentence, but hey, maybe I haven't had enough coffee yet.


_______________________________________________
Win4Lin-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.netraverse.com/mailman/listinfo/win4lin-users