If you really want to run Linux under Windows (W2K supports VMWare) you
can run Cygwin, which is a reasonably good implementation. However, both
VMware (under W2K) and Cygwin (under almost any Windows) works painfully
slow. If you think VMWare is slow under Linux, it is far worse under W2K.
atc
On Wed, 2 May 2001, Larry Marshall wrote:
>
> > It runs the other way round to win4lin - allows a guest OS to run on win
> > NT, win 2k or winME (that's the surprising one), but one would have
> > thought a linux host/ win9x guest can't be far away???
>
> The best part of Win4Lin is that when Windows shows me the big blue
> screen, I can just kill the process. Why would I want to depend upon
> Windows to run Linux? Wouldn't I be back where I started?
>
> Cheers --- Larry
> _______________________________________________
> Win4Lin-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.netraverse.com/mailman/listinfo/win4lin-users
>
_______________________________________________
Win4Lin-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.netraverse.com/mailman/listinfo/win4lin-users
