Andrew T Chan wrote: > If you really want to run Linux under Windows (W2K supports VMWare) you > can run Cygwin, which is a reasonably good implementation. However, both > VMware (under W2K) and Cygwin (under almost any Windows) works painfully > slow. If you think VMWare is slow under Linux, it is far worse under W2K. If you just want to run some Linux apps under WinNT or Win2K, try LINE (it's on SourceForge): It extends Cygwin with many additional Linux APIs. You will probably also want the NT port of XFree86 (or any other NT X server) if you plan to run Linux GUI apps. -BobC _______________________________________________ Win4Lin-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.netraverse.com/mailman/listinfo/win4lin-users
- [Win4Lin-users] connectix - new kid on the block robert w hall
- Re: [Win4Lin-users] connectix - new kid on the b... Larry Marshall
- Re: [Win4Lin-users] connectix - new kid on t... Andrew T Chan
- Re: [Win4Lin-users] connectix - new kid ... Robert W. Cunningham
- Re: [Win4Lin-users] connectix - new ... Michael L Torrie
- Re: [Win4Lin-users] connectix - new kid on the b... Michael L Torrie
- Re: [Win4Lin-users] connectix - new kid on the b... Michael L Torrie
- Re: [Win4Lin-users] connectix - new kid on t... Adam Stanley
- Re: [Win4Lin-users] connectix - new kid on the b... Raymond Shwake
- [Win4Lin-users] Comparative review in Spanis... Bill Hayles
- Re: [Win4Lin-users] Comparative review i... robert w hall
- Re: [Win4Lin-users] Comparative revi... Bill Hayles
- Re: [Win4Lin-users] Comparative... Texstar
- Re: [Win4Lin-users] Compara... Larry Marshall
