On Tuesday 29 May 2001 11:52 am, Raymond Shwake may or may not have written:
> Dan Swartzendruber wrote:
> > At 10:21 AM 5/29/2001 -0400, Mike Badger wrote:
> > >There are no plans to start a win4lin newsgroup from anyone at
> > >NeTraverse.
> >
> > what would be involved in starting an alt.* group? this would not
> > require any official sanction by netraverse, but would be extremely
> > helpful.
>
> comp.unix.dos-under-unix already exists as a place where such
> products as the similar Merge are discussed, so discussions of Win4Lin
> would fit right in. (Since Merge is an SCO product such discussions are
> also find - maybe more commonly - under comp.unix.sco.misc.) There are
> specific procedures for creating new groups (including a call for
> discussion and a subsequent call for votes to gauge public consensus).
My provider carries it, but it's just full of spam.
I think it would be a great idea to use it -- no hassle setting up a new
group and using an existing resource.
Hoyt
_______________________________________________
Win4Lin-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.netraverse.com/mailman/listinfo/win4lin-users
