I'm a Window-Eyes user - or I was - and it seemed to me that as Window-Eyes 
kept updating its Scripts, Apps or whatever you call them - the worse the 
Screen Reader got.

A classic case in point is that dreadful thing GW Micro call Browse mode and I 
won't repeat everything I've already said about it as everything I said still 
unfortunately holds true, I just tell any user to compare with say NVDA or JAWS 
and spot the difference.


On 13/07/2013, at 12:15 AM, Gordon Smith <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dane, Could you qualify that statement please?  I have to admit that in some 
> respects NVDA is also very much floundering in the dark.  There are add-ons 
> which make more functionality possible, that is true.  But in some respects 
> NVDA is a little like the blind leading the blind.  Window-Eyes, on the same 
> screen, (RollBAck's Main Menu, for instance), is far more functional and easy 
> to navigate.  Also on some websites NVDA just gets itself in a total tangle, 
> whereas other screen-readers including Window-Eyes cope very well.  I haven't 
> yet had the opportunity to try the same resources with Jaws, but I'm sure it 
> would handle them fine.  So what I'm asking you is how specifically 
> Window-Eyes has gone down hill?  Perhaps if you could qualify what you're 
> saying, others could try the same experiments to see what results they get.  
> Be mindful also of the fact that it is entirely possible that local 
> configuration parameters can often profoundly impact on the performance of 
> high level
  r
> esources such as Window-Eyes and NVDA, and that is why I am asking you to 
> qualify your statement.
> 
> I am not advocating GW Micro, nor am I defending them.  I merely am 
> interested to know what you mean.
> 
> Harping back to a previous comment you made about Windows 8 in another post, 
> can you qualify that too?  You said, I believe, that you haven't tried 
> Windows 8.  If that is the case, how do you support your comments regarding 
> accessibility?  Are you taking your information from the comments of others?  
> If so, as somebody who has used and is using Windows 8, I would like to know 
> what the original author of the accessibility issues comment was eluding too. 
>  Again, as somebody who has used it for quite some time, I find it to be at 
> least as accessible as Windows 7, profoundly more accessible than Windows 
> Vista and, once you get used to the new interface, just as accessible and 
> navigable as Windows XP which, as I believe Chris also pointed out on list 
> some time ago, will be discontinued as of 30 June 2014.  Indeed, I believe 
> that Office 2007 support is also to be discontinued shortly if it hasn't 
> already been.
> 
> I remember that when I installed Window-Eyes version 8, I read something in 
> GW's documentation about "Limited" support for Office 2013.  If that is the 
> case, they had better get their proverbial skates on.  NVDA appears, for 
> example, to work fine with Word 2013, although I have not yet tried any of 
> the other Office components.  System Access also appears very usable with 
> Windows 8, although I haven't as yet tried it with Office 2010 or Office 2013.
> 
> Kind regards
> 
> <--- Gordon Smith --->
> 
> <[email protected]>
> 
> Telephone:
> 
> United Kingdom:  Free Phone:
> 0800 8620538
> 
> Mobile:
> +44 7907 823971
> 
> Europe and other non-specified:
> +44 1642 688095
> 
> United States Of America And Canada:
> +1 646 9151493
> Or:
> +1 209 436 9443
> 
> Vic.  Australia:
> +61 38 8205930
> Vic.  Australia
> +61 39 0284505
> 
> Fax:
> +44 1642 365123
> 
> Follow Us On Twitter:
> <http://twitter.com/maciosaccess>
> 
> Skype:
> <skype:mac-access-dot-net?call>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> On 12 Jul 2013, at 14:36, Dane Trethowan <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> I've given this a great deal of thought.
>> 
>> I hoped to be able to order the Social-Eyes last week but that will have to 
>> wait a little longer but despite all of this I have to confess myself 
>> somewhat disappointed that GW Micro are spending a whole heap of resources 
>> trying to sell Social-Eyes, Gw Connect and God only knows what else at the 
>> neglect of the main product which GW Micro is famous for, that being 
>> Window-Eyes.
>> 
>> I installed the latest version on 1 of my PC's yesterday and to say that 
>> Window-Eyes has gone downhill in a very short period of time would certainly 
>> be an understatement.
> 
> =======================================
> 
> To post to this group, please send your message to:
> [email protected]
> The Windows-Access E-Mail forum is guaranteed malware, spyware, Trojan, virus 
> and worm-free
> 
> To modify your subscription options, please visit your personalise subscriber 
> options page, located at
> http://mail.tft-bbs.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/windows-access
> 
> You can find an archive of all messages posted to the Windows-Access forum at 
> either of the following websites:
> http://mail.tft-bbs.co.uk/pipermail/windows-access/index.html
> Or:
> <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>
> 
> you may also subscribe to this list via RSS.  The feed is at:
> <http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml>
> 
> ---------------------------------------
> 
> 
> [email protected]


**********

Dane Trethowan
Skype: grtdane12
Phone US (213) 438-9741
Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
Mobile: +61400494862
Fax +61397437954



=======================================

To post to this group, please send your message to:
[email protected]
The Windows-Access E-Mail forum is guaranteed malware, spyware, Trojan, virus 
and worm-free

To modify your subscription options, please visit your personalise subscriber 
options page, located at
http://mail.tft-bbs.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/windows-access

You can find an archive of all messages posted to the Windows-Access forum at 
either of the following websites:
http://mail.tft-bbs.co.uk/pipermail/windows-access/index.html
Or:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]>

you may also subscribe to this list via RSS.  The feed is at:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.xml>

---------------------------------------


[email protected]

Reply via email to