Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Ove Kaaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Well, the SBCS codepage NLS files, yes. The other files (toupper/tolower >> in l_intl.nls, which I did figure out recently by looking at YAW sources, >> the locale files, and especially the sorting tables, which is still a >> mystery to me) are not quite as simple. > >I think we are better off doing our own format. This way we can keep >it simple, and avoid trouble when Microsoft changes the format between >releases. Microsoft did not change format of NLS files for Win2000. And as wrote in my mail "1. Such functions as RtlCustomCPToUnicodeN and RtlUnicodeToCustomCPN (which I propose to use in x11drv to support fonts that have encodings different from Unicode/ANSI/OEM/Mac) have very strong dependence and will be never implemented without that." Dmitry.
- Re: Internal CP to Unicode and vice versa conversions Dmitry Timoshkov
- Re: Internal CP to Unicode and vice versa conversi... Ove Kaaven
- Re: Internal CP to Unicode and vice versa conv... Alexandre Julliard
- Re: Internal CP to Unicode and vice versa conversi... Huw D M Davies
- Re: Internal CP to Unicode and vice versa conversi... Dmitry Timoshkov
- Re: Internal CP to Unicode and vice versa conversi... Dmitry Timoshkov
- Re: Internal CP to Unicode and vice versa conv... Alexandre Julliard
- Re: Internal CP to Unicode and vice versa conversi... Dmitry Timoshkov
- Re: Internal CP to Unicode and vice versa conv... Alexandre Julliard
- Re: Internal CP to Unicode and vice versa conv... Ove Kaaven
- Re: Internal CP to Unicode and vice versa conversi... Dmitry Timoshkov
- Re: Internal CP to Unicode and vice versa conversi... Dmitry Timoshkov
- Re: Internal CP to Unicode and vice versa conversi... Dmitry Timoshkov
- Re: Internal CP to Unicode and vice versa conversi... Dmitry Timoshkov