Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Ove Kaaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Well, the SBCS codepage NLS files, yes. The other files (toupper/tolower
>> in l_intl.nls, which I did figure out recently by looking at YAW sources,
>> the locale files, and especially the sorting tables, which is still a
>> mystery to me) are not quite as simple.
>
>I think we are better off doing our own format. This way we can keep
>it simple, and avoid trouble when Microsoft changes the format between
>releases.

Microsoft did not change format of NLS files for Win2000.
And as wrote in my mail
"1. Such functions as RtlCustomCPToUnicodeN and RtlUnicodeToCustomCPN (which
I propose to use in x11drv to support fonts that have encodings different
from Unicode/ANSI/OEM/Mac) have very strong dependence and will be never
implemented without that."

Dmitry.

Reply via email to