[Winona Online Democracy] --Tom, a better question might be : what good will come from a private evaluation?
Will it be a legitamite evaluation when the process itself is flawed? The direct reports are to do the evaluation of Mr. Durand. The school board chairman said his preference would be for them to voluntarily sign their evaluation forms, but it was not a requirement. After the evaluation forms are completed they are to be turned in to Durand's secretary, who will then check them off the list. Does that sound like the way we want this process to be done? A flawed process will produce flawed results. I watched the board meeting this week and was very upset when Natalie Siderius read her statement regarding the teachers showing up at the public comment session and presenting statements to the board. Why does this board want to restrict the input of the teachers? Why has the superintendent told teachers that they cannot contact board members? Why was the high school staff told they could not discuss certain issues and certain people? Gary Shurson -- Tom Severson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [Winona Online Democracy] > _______________________________________________ This message was posted to Winona Online Democracy All messages must be signed by the senders actual name. No commercial solicitations are allowed on this list. To manage your subscription or view the message archives, please visit http://mapnp.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/winona Any problems or suggestions can be directed to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] If you want help on how to contact elected officials, go to the Contact page at http://www.winonaonlinedemocracy.org
