Hello Lief (and all)

I have Linrad, I run Knoppix. I have no idea how to set Linrad up. I 
have messed this for some time, with no success. My experience is 
similar to that of Mike, W5UC, and I am no dummy in this area of 
computers, as I have done my share of programming and computer 
construction/modifications.The setup of LIinrad is just too complex 
for me to take the time. We need from you, Lief, a step by step 
procedure. It would be good for you to have someone as your assistant 
who is a user rather than a programmer/developer, who.could write up 
a clear procedure and present it in the step-by-step form. I feel 
this is the only way most of us are going to be able to share in the 
advantages of Linrad.


At 03:28 3/9/2007, you wrote:
>Hello Mike,
>
> > I spent around 3 months in Linux Hell trying to get Linrad going
> > and vowed that Linux would never again run on any machine I own.  I
> > plan to keep that vow.
>
> >From the conversations we had, only two mails in my files,
>my impression is that you had no difficulties with Linux.
>Everything was related to Linrad.
>
>Linrad is very different from Winrad, it is far more complicated
>to use and it can be set up for many different purposes. From
>what you wrote my impression is that you found Linrad useless
>because it was too complicated - but that has nothing to do with
>the operating system. You can run Linrad under Windows if you
>want to avoid "Linux Hell" but it would have changed nothing.
>Linrad behaves exactly the same and puts the same requirements
>on the user regardless of the operating system.
>
>Linrad will allow reception of signals that you can not receive
>with Winrad or any other receiver in case you have heavy powerline
>noise at the same time as you have strong local signals close
>in frequency. It does not come for free. Linrad is not mature
>enough to do everything automatically for you. The reason is that
>I am looking for usages that we not yet have the hardware for
>and I have purpously made Linrad make no assumption about what
>hardware the user might have connected.
>
>Generally Linux is far easier to install than Windows if you
>have found a scrap computer with unknown hardware inside.
>I have solid experience with Linux, Win 98 and Win 2000.
>To make Windows work one has to find out what the hardware
>really is, then one might be lucky to find drivers on
>the Internet. With Linux everything is usually included
>and installed automatically. It is of course very
>different with new computers where the manufacturer
>supplies a CD with Windows drivers for exactly the
>hardware you bought. Linux may not have them (yet) and
>that is surely a problem.
>
>Have a look here:
>http://www.sm5bsz.com/linuxdsp/install/distrib.htm
>Linrad runs under every Linux distribution that I have
>tested (29 of them) and I have no reason to believe
>it would not run on any other distribution. I have
>tried several computers from Pentium 133 MHz up to
>modern ones. Surely there are difficulties in
>installing modern Linux distributions on old
>computers that do not have enough memory - but
>Windows is not difficult, it is simply impossible.
>
>Linux has better real-time properties as compared to
>Windows 2000 (and Win 98 is bad) I only have Windows XP
>on modern laptops so I do not know if it is better.
>(I refuse to pay for making a test with XP on elderly
>computers) On modern computers any operating system
>is perfectly adequate for SDR at bandwidths of 100
>kHz and below so it does not really matter.
>
>I do not think the OS as such is much of a problem.
>The real problem is how to find well working drive
>routines for the better hardware that we will get
>in the future. If manufacturers decide to keep the
>internal architecture secret and just supply a CD
>with drivers for Windows Vista we will have to
>use it until we have software that emulates Vista
>for the drive routines. This is what we have to do
>to make modern WLAN cards work under Linux.....
>
>73
>
>Leif / SM5BSZ
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Winrad mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://winrad.org/mailman/listinfo/winrad_winrad.org



_______________________________________________
Winrad mailing list
[email protected]
http://winrad.org/mailman/listinfo/winrad_winrad.org

Reply via email to