Hi, Jeff.
" ...pushing the average to no more than about 6..."  Do you mean 6
residents? and what is the average number of wireless devices per
resident in your campus? thanks.

On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 17:50 -0800, Jeffrey Sessler wrote:
> In our residential halls we've deployed dual-radio 802.11n AP's at a
> level where we average no more than 10 people per AP. Moving
> forward, our new residential halls will move to an AP per suite,
> pushing the average to no more than about 6. At our peak demand per
> day, our campus client-per-AP average is about 5.5. We're seeing peak
> bandwidth use on Wireless in range of 400Mbps downstream and 100Mbs
> upstream. 
>  
> Since 2003, we've offered "Gigabit to the Pillow," but with the advent
> of the WiFi coverage, use of the wired ports is now minimal. In fact,
> when I mentioned to a first-year that she had the option of using a
> wired ethernet port, she said "What's that?"
>  
> Jeff
> 
> >>> On Thursday, November 10, 2011 at 3:13 PM, in message
> <[email protected]>, "Hanset, Philippe C"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Ron,
> 
> Frank implemented his reply-to on his own. There is nothing that we
> can do to prevent that I believe.
> (Frank, would you please change that setting)
> 
> About the article, we are facing the same... people want a "home"
> experience in their dorms,
> and the expectations are insane. This said, with the amount of devices
> without a wired ethernet
> capability, it's hard to tell users to go back to a cable!
> I have just proposed a design at UTK that would have each Wi-Fi AP
> shared by 8 people on average in the dorms, and Wired "on demand".
> (e.g. $40 per semester for an activation)
> The cables and switches are there, but completely underused (mostly
> used because our initial Wi-Fi was built as a complement).
> Wireless only in the dorms is a great thing in term of capacity
> planning. You don't have sleeping ethernet ports anymore.
> Our switches are going on 8-9 years, so instead of replacing them we
> might just have switches for wireless with a little extra
> capacity for "wired on demand". 
> Providing wireless coverage and capacity for 8 people per AP and
> changing only switches needed for wireless will have a cost very
> similar to
> replacing all current switches (we plan to locate APs in bedrooms, no
> extra wiring cost!).
> We have heard of many successful stories of wireless only dorms on
> this list, we certainly hope to share it.
> 
> We also plan to have one wireless subnet per dorm to support MDNS
> (Bonjour etc...).
> Bring your Apple TVs and Airplays kids...
> (maybe some rate limiting ;-)
> 
> Best,
> 
> Philippe
> Univ. of TN, Knoxville
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Nov 10, 2011, at 1:07 PM, Parker, Ron wrote:
> 
> > It looks like the reply-to on the list isn't working right or
> something. I posted a witty rejoinder to this message and it went only
> to the original poster rather than the list. Frank has probably
> implemented an e-mail sender filter as a result. Perhaps our gracious
> list admin could check and see if I'm mistaken?
> > 
> > I couldn't tell how much of what happened at Skidmore was a Time
> Warner problem versus other issues. There seem to be a lot of things
> all going on at the same time. I've heard my colleagues at other
> colleges talk about challenges with outsourcing residence hall
> networking. One of them had what sounds like a similar experience with
> a virus outbreak at the beginning of this semester. Unfortunately, it
> was the college IT staff running around fixing things and taking the
> blame rather than the vendor. 
> > 
> > Since this is the wireless list, I'll focus on the wireless issues.
> If you ask me, this is the important quote: "'The original design of
> the wireless system in the residence halls was to provide supplemental
> coverage to the wired network in your rooms," said Sipher'" So a
> student is sitting there with an unused 100 meg or gig wired port that
> would probably work fine but the Skidmore folks are being sent running
> around with their hair on fire because the outsourced wireless is
> overloaded. I just think user expectations of wireless are unrealistic
> and we in IT are probably not doing a good job of correcting that. I
> routinely tell people here to use a wired connection if what they are
> doing is important. This is in spite of the fact that we have a
> honking new wireless system with the latest and greatest magic
> available. 
> > 
> > I am definitely in the club of "been there done that" along with the
> folks at Skidmore. Sounds like they are trying to do a good job of
> communicating about the situation and I've always found that goes a
> long way towards making everyone happier. There is a lot of good
> information in that article. 
> > 
> > --
> > Ron Parker, Director of Information Technology, Brazosport College
> > Voice: (979) 230-3480             FAX: (979) 230-3111
> > http://www.brazosport.edu
> > 
> > This e-mail sent from my non-mobile, 64-bit, quad core, Windows 7
> workstation. 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
> >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk
> >> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 9:02 AM
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] College deals with wireless issues
> >> 
> >>
> http://www.skidmorenews.com/news/information-technology-department-addresses
> >> -wireless-issues-1.2691856#.TrvkfkMUqdA
> >> 
> >> This article has some details but doesn't make it very clear if all
> the
> >> problems have been DNS or otherwise, but I thought there might be
> some
> >> people on this list who find this news article interesting.
> >> 
> >> I don't think Skidmore is on this list, as I don't meant to
> embarrass
> >> anyone.  We've all "been there" in one circumstance or another.
> >> 
> >> Frank
> >> 
> >> **********
> >> Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
> Constituent
> >> Group discussion list can be found at
> http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
> > 
> > **********
> > Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
> http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
> > 
> 
> **********
> Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
> Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
> http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
> 
> ********** Participation and subscription information for this
> EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
> http://www.educause.edu/groups/. 
> 


-- 
Leo Song, Senior Analyst & Cluster Lead
Computing and Communication Services - Networking and Security
University of Guelph
(519) 824-4120 x 53181 



**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to