If we could provide great / sufficient / pervasive "non-wired" coverage using $40 AP instead of $400 Cisco AP, resident might not want to bring in their own $40 AP.
I didn't use word, wireless, but non-wired instead. Will carrier be not interested to penetrate such market? On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 15:39 +0000, Hanset, Philippe C wrote: > Pay $40 to violate our AUP and have a chance to be disconnected and > not recover $40. > > I guess you can never discard dumb people! > We will handle them carefully and one by one ;-) > > > Philippe > > > > > > > > On Nov 11, 2011, at 9:25 AM, Osborne, Bruce W wrote: > > > > > And what if somebody pays your $40 per semester to connect their > > personal AP to your network? > > > > Bruce Osborne > > Wireless Network Engineer > > IT Network Services > > > > (434) 592-4229 > > > > LIBERTY UNIVERSITY > > 40 Years of Training Champions for Christ: 1971-2011 > > > > From: Hanset, Philippe C [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 8:44 PM > > Subject: Re: College deals with wireless issues > > > > If you provide a great wifi coverage and no wired access > > You shouldn't have to worry about rogues (since there is > > No port to connect to ;-) > > > > Philippe, > > University. Of TN, Knoxville > > > > On Nov 10, 2011, at 8:29 PM, "Jeff Kell" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On 11/10/2011 8:24 PM, Harry Rauch wrote: > > We have in our internet docs for students that rogue > > wireless devices that interferes with the dorm's internet > > usage will be requested to shutdown or the student will lose > > internet rights for 30 days. Students seem to be more than > > willing to shut off their wireless router after they are > > made aware of the problem; they honestly don't have a clue > > about the effects of their personal wireless and the > > school's. > > > > We have similar policies. If we detect a rogue (shows up in > > our NAC as a NATed client), we quarantine the MAC address of > > the router. If they connect to their rogue wireless, they > > get a captive portal telling them to disconnect it! If they > > then connect directly, they are fine again. Other than us > > having to mark the MACs, it is self-remediating (and if the > > MAC returns, it gets the same result, regardless of the > > jack/location). > > > > Jeff > > ********** Participation and subscription information for > > this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found > > at http://www.educause.edu/groups/. > > ********** Participation and subscription information for this > > EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found > > athttp://www.educause.edu/groups/. > > > > ********** Participation and subscription information for this > > EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found > > athttp://www.educause.edu/groups/. > > > > > > > > > > > ********** Participation and subscription information for this > EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at > http://www.educause.edu/groups/. > -- Leo Song, Senior Analyst & Cluster Lead Computing and Communication Services - Networking and Security University of Guelph (519) 824-4120 x 53181 ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
