We use snmptrap translator aka snmptt running on our monitoring server that 
sends them to a perl script that I wrote to put them into a friendly output.

~James Elliott

-----Original Message-----
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Vlade Ristevski
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 1:44 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms

Do you mind sharing what system/method you use to record the mac-notify 
messages and to parse them? We also have mac-notification setup but Cisco 
doesn't send a user friendly notification but If-Indexes  with VLANs in hex 
instead. Its' very helpful to have put a pain in the ass to parse.


On 10/16/2014 1:19 PM, James Elliott wrote:
> We have a homegrown tool that uses some of the features of the Cisco Rogue 
> Locator Tool, without needing the infringing wireless network to be open.
> We have cisco snmp mac -notification setup for all ports on campus, so we are 
> able to identify each where each device is plugged in on our network.  We 
> take the mac address of the observed rogue AP and add 1 to the mac, and 
> subtract 1 from the mac.  This gives us 3 MAC addresses to compare to what is 
> plugged into the network.  Once the port is identified, we get an email of 
> the device wireless mac, wired mac, switch and port it is connected to, and 
> even the IP address it pulled from DHCP.
>
> At this point, we use our maps to identify the room number, turn off all the 
> ports in the room and notify Res Life of the infraction.  We were able to get 
> most of the wireless routers on campus using this technique.
>
> James Elliott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Frank 
> Sweetser
> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 1:16 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms
>
> +1 to USB free USB cables as one of the more effective tools for 
> +combating
> wireless printers.
>
> More and more, it's not a case of people deciding to use wireless over wired, 
> but instead it simply never occurs to them that they can get internet through 
> that funny rectangularish hole.  There's not much you can do for that except 
> free cables and a constant, consistent education campaign.
>
> Frank Sweetser fs at wpi.edu    |  For every problem, there is a solution that
> Manager of Network Operations   |  is simple, elegant, and wrong.
> Worcester Polytechnic Institute |           - HL Mencken
>
> On 10/16/2014 12:15 PM, Peter P Morrissey wrote:
>> That has been our approach. We have 100% coverage in residences and 
>> there isn’t usually a good reason to have an offending device with 
>> the exception of devices that just won’t work on our Enterprise network that 
>> Lee had mentioned.
>> We have found that once we explain the situation to students, they 
>> are fine with turning them off or allowing us to help them turn them 
>> turn off the WiFi feature and find a better way to connect. Most 
>> devices have wired connections that can be utilized, and from what I 
>> understand, for a gamer this gives them a slight advantage due to 
>> lower latency. (I could be wrong about that though as I am not a 
>> gamer). We also attempt to do a lot of education before and during 
>> opening, and have a large stash of extra long USB cables that we give 
>> out freely. We have people helping students move in and nip a lot of this in 
>> the bud from the beginning.  You can get USB cables very cheap in bulk BTW.
>> I’m not saying it is perfect, but we don’t get any performance 
>> complaints at all, although it is certainly possible that there are 
>> complaints that don’t get to us.
>>
>> Pete Morrissey
>>
>> *From:*The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
>> [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Heath 
>> Barnhart
>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 16, 2014 12:04 PM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms
>>
>> As I read the case, sending deauth's is exactly what the Marriot's 
>> system was doing.
>>
>> We used don't have that bad of a rogue issue since we upgraded our 
>> WiFi in the dorms three years ago. I think I had 3 this year, and I 
>> just track them down the best I can (by me I mean my student worker), 
>> and have a polite conversation with the offender. I haven't had a 
>> problem with this method, though I've never been faced with 700 
>> rogues. What types of devices are being classified as rogues?
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Heath Barnhart
>>
>> ITS Network Administrator
>>
>> Washburn University
>>
>> 785-670-2307
>>
>> On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 11:39 -0400, Philippe Hanset wrote:
>>
>>      I think that the Marriott court case needs to be put into perspective.
>>
>>      Many of us have been quarantining rogue APs without any trouble.
>>
>>      The Marriott case is somewhat different. They were preventing all Wi-Fi
>>      from being enabled
>>
>>      and they were selling theirs as the only Wi-Fi around.
>>
>>      BTW, rogue containment is usually not "jamming". Jamming requires to
>>      interfere with the spectrum.
>>
>>      Some of those smart containment software don't actually jam the 
>> frequency
>>      but send a disassociation frame to a specific client.
>>
>>      Also a lot of us are preventing rogue APs that are actually interfering
>>      with the University Infrastructure on the same frequencies.
>>
>>      Those students are actually the jammers in this case and I don't see why
>>      you couldn't protect yourself by preventing them from interfering with 
>> the
>>      University
>>
>>      Wi-Fi on University grounds.
>>
>>      As I wrote above, the Marriott case is being taken way too literally and
>>      being blown out of proportions.
>>
>>      I doubt that the FCC will come to you because you are actually trying to
>>      provide a service to your community and for free.
>>
>>      Just make sure that you only block channels that you are using (and a 
>> few
>>      around to guarantee non overlapping) and not ALL of them!
>>
>>      And don't use containment on the coffee shop next door ;-)
>>
>>      My 1.99 cents,
>>
>>      Philippe
>>
>>      Philippe Hanset
>>
>>      www.anyroam.net <http://www.anyroam.net>
>>
>>      On Oct 16, 2014, at 11:13 AM, Ian McDonald <[email protected]
>>      <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>          Breach of your written policy prohibiting such things isn’t a
>>          disciplinary matter? And can’t be fixed with your disciplinary 
>> system?
>>
>>          *From:* The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
>>          [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *T. 
>> Shayne Ghere
>>          *Sent:* 16 October 2014 16:11
>>          *To:* [email protected]
>>          <mailto:[email protected]>
>>          *Subject:* [WIRELESS-LAN] Wireless in Dorms
>>
>>          Good morning.
>>
>>          Let me say first off, we’re nearly a complete Cisco shop other than
>>          our Firewalls right now.  We are running 3 – Cisco 5508 Wireless Lan
>>          Controllers and Cisco WCS.
>>
>>          The AP’s in the Dorm’s and Greek houses are all 1142N AP’s and have
>>          been spaced accordingly by Cisco and by us during the introduction 
>> of
>>          wireless in the Dorms, Greeks and Single housing.
>>
>>          We are having a heck of a time with all the interference that the
>>          students bring with them making our wireless nearly unusable.  I 
>> know
>>          this topic has come up in the past, but this year is one of the 
>> worst
>>          we’ve seen, and the students are getting restless.
>>
>>          We have the ability to quarantine rogue Wireless clients, however
>>          according to a recent Court case against a large Hotel Chain, it was
>>          decided that on an open free wireless spectrum, we would be breaking
>>          the law in jamming it.
>>
>>          How have you addressed this issue?  I’m about ready to ask upper
>>          management to remove the AP’s in all the Dorm buildings and let the
>>          students bring their own AP’s if they want wireless.   Has anyone
>>          resorted to this?
>>
>>          Thanks for your input
>>
>>          Shayne
>>
>>          ********** Participation and subscription information for this
>>          EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found
>>          athttp://www.educause.edu/groups/.
>>
>>      ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
>>      Constituent Group discussion list can be found at
>>      http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
>>
> **********
> Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent 
> Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

Reply via email to