Agree 100%, and that’s why vendor provided solutions such as dynamic channel-width selection will be important. Provide less incentive for the engineers to turn knobs, and let the software do the bulk of the work as a co-function with RRM. Too often people falsely believe that they know better than the software and that’s when they get into trouble. Well, any knob that goes to 11 is probably ok. ☺
Jeff From: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> on behalf of GT Hill <g...@nyansa.com> Reply-To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> Date: Friday, May 27, 2016 at 12:35 PM To: "wireless-lan@listserv.educause.edu" <WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Beacon Intervals If implementers stay disciplined and keep deployed channel sizes in check then yes, co-channel interference shouldn’t be an issue. But we all know that won’t happen. ********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.
