Props Jake!


From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gray, Sean
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2017 4:01 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 GHz Interference



Hi Everyone,



So I’ve been doing some more testing today. I’ve been walking around in the 
same area I took the screen grab from with the Wi-Fi turned off on my 
Surface monitoring the 2.4GHz spectrum and everything looks normal. Then 
when I turn the Wi-Fi on I see the same thing as my Surface goes through its 
probe cycle. So Jake, you nailed it! the surprising thing for me is the fact 
that I have seen this behaviour run continuously for over 10 minutes. No 
wonder the battery life sucks :)



Thanks to everyone for their input. I’ll continue to play around and 
investigate further, but this has been a great education for someone at the 
early stages of his wireless career.



Sean



From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jake Snyder
Sent: March-08-17 10:37 PM
To: [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 GHz Interference



Power and distance matter greatly in RF.  Could be differences in client TX 
power, distance from the wispy, the client card, or even the filters in the 
card.  Even the same make/model of card can variants in output.  Partially 
why we can't have calibrated cards in wifi.



2.4GHz will look slightly different than 5GHz due to the the non-ofdm nature 
of the preamble. That signature slope away from channel is a good bet that 
it's the wifi from your laptop.  Also, the strength is absurdly high.  If 
the wispy wasn't on top of the source there's no way it would be at -20 
without you glowing or your hair itching.



Combine that with the fact that it follows him around and I'm reasonably 
convinced.  Not saying there isn't something else, but taking a capture 
without the super high ACI and you'll get a better picture.





Sent from my iPhone


On Mar 8, 2017, at 9:53 PM, CHARLES ALBERT ENFIELD III <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Thanks Jake.  I was aware of the shape of the side band, but I thought I 
remembered it starting 30 dB below the peak.  I guess it’s more like 20. 
Jason’s trace seems to corroborate that.  Sean’s trace seems to be 10 to 15 
dB.



The sideband emissions on the Revolution Wi-Fi image looks more like Sean’s 
than Jason’s.  I think this is relevant because the nature of the OFDM 
sideband emissions is determined by the subcarrier width and channel width. 
Sean and Jason both have the same parameters for both, but in Jason’s trace 
the side lobe disappears into the low noise floor within about 35MHz while 
Sean’s doesn’t disappear into the much higher noise floor until about 55Mhz. 
Sean’s 20MHz channel looks much more like the 80MHz channel image on Rev 
Wifi.



FWIW, I’m increasingly convinced your hunch is right.  Perhaps I’m taking 
these traces from inexpensive equipment a little too literally.  I know they 
are approximations at best, but I’m trying to figure out what’s going on.  I’m 
hopeful that thinking this through will improve my understanding.  Something 
in Sean’s trace still doesn’t add up for me.



From: Jake Snyder <mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2017 9:16 PM
To: Chuck Enfield <mailto:[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 GHz Interference





Might check this out:

http://revolutionwifi.blogspot.com/2014/08/80211ac-adjacent-channel-interference.html?m=1



There's and image there you should find similar.

Sent from my iPhone


On Mar 8, 2017, at 4:58 PM, Chuck Enfield <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Cool images.  I’ve never tried this.  I would have this afternoon, but our 
operations guys have the spectrum analyzer in another building.  I’m a 
little surprised to see as nice a plot as you got in the second trace. 
Between near field effects and the potential to push the Rx amplifiers into 
a non-linear region I would have expected something more messy.



Do you know what the max signal strength was in the two traces?  Also, do 
you know how to account for the increased duty cycle in the second one?  I’m 
wondering if this is due to different iperf behavior or if it’s weirdness 
caused by proximity.  I’ve been doing Wi-Fi for 15 years and still find 
myself guessing on a regular basis.



From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason Cook
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 6:08 PM
To: [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 GHz Interference



Still learning my way through signatures but I have been caught out before 
with the anaylzer being too close to a wifi source

Below shows this on channel 132, using iperf  for a data burst in the first 
image the anaylzer is 1m away from a Mac Air,

In the second it’s a few centimetres away from it. You can really see the 
impact on neighbouring channels at that distance  (I think there’s even a 
bit in the 36-40 area)



I now keep the anaylzer away from wifi devices as much as possible :)



<image003.jpg>



<image005.jpg>



--

Jason Cook

Technology Services

The University of Adelaide, AUSTRALIA 5005

Ph    : +61 8 8313 4800



From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gray, Sean
Sent: Thursday, 9 March 2017 7:26 AM
To: [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 GHz Interference



Nope, the spectrum analyzer is going directly into a Surface Pro 2.





From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jake Snyder
Sent: March-08-17 1:30 PM
To: [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 2.4 GHz Interference



Are you using a USB 3.0 hub?





On Mar 8, 2017, at 1:23 PM, Jason Heffner <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:



I’ve seen something similar when running some of the older Cisco 
controllers. If you ruled out everything else and are starting to look for 
devices causing interference I'd check out some of your wireless mic 
systems. We had some 800Mhz that we had to salvage that were causing 
harmonic distortion on 2.4GHZ similar to this on the lower channels.

On Mar 8, 2017, at 2:32 PM, Gray, Sean <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:



Hi Everyone,



I’ve been doing a little spectrum analysis around campus and I keep seeing 
the same interference signature in different buildings. I was wondering if 
anyone had seen anything like this before. It is typically visible for well 
over 10 minutes at a time and then it completely disappears.



Thanks



Sean





Sean Gray | B.Sc (Hons)

Voice, Collaboration & Wireless Network Analyst

ITS, University of Lethbridge





********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
<http://www.educause.edu/discuss> http://www.educause.edu/discuss.

<Unknown Interference Source.PNG>



********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/discuss.





********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/discuss.

********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/discuss.

********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/discuss.

********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/discuss.

********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/discuss.

********** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE 
Constituent Group discussion list can be found at 
http://www.educause.edu/discuss.


**********
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group 
discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/discuss.

Reply via email to