John Foust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|Mind you, an otherwise 801.11b compliant Cisco AP will recognize
|that a Cisco "workgroup bridge" has associated and it will pass
|up to eight MAC addresses. So a Cisco AP can be flexible enough
|when it wants to be.
Moreover, a BR340 (aka BR500) in AP mode will allow a WAP11 to register
all its client MAC addresses (at least as reported here). An AP4800E
running bit-for-bit the same firmware as the BR340 will not. This supports
the theory that it is a deliberate block based on the bridge/AP cookie.
Someone on eBay was offering an APxxxx->BRxxx conversion, though he did not
respond to my email asking if he had to change the hardware. Assuming this
isn't just a scam to steal access points, the cat may be out of the bag...
Dan Lanciani
ddl@danlan.*com
--
general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
[un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
