> > http://dailywireless.org/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1483 > > > > Atheros has announced A/B/G and B/G chipsets that claim to have -105dBm > > receive sensitivity. > > > > Is this feasible? > > Possibly. There are many ways to increase receive sensitivity. If > you are dealing with thermal noise, you want nice low noise amplifiers > such as GAS-FETs. Folks with earthstations would even run liquid > nitrogen to lower the tempature of the LNA electronics to get the > thermal noise down,
Yes :) http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Glenn+Elmore+174+dBm&hl=uk&lr=&ie=UTF-8&inlang=ru&selm=3F4E248B.1040100%40sonic.net&rnum=2 > although I don't think I want a tank of nitrogen > tied to my laptop. > > > And what's the effect on range of having a high receive sensitivity on > > the client side but not on the AP side? > > I guess packets get there but not come back. :-) > > You ussually want both. > > Tim > -- > general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> > [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless -- general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/> [un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
