On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 08:26:07 -0700, "Michael Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> 
> I considered sending "I'm working on it" to the list, but that seemed
> pretty lame imo. 

That's certainly a responsible thought.  But I don't think you need feel
it's lame at all!  Your info is new from your last post, is relevant &
helpful.  All of which, in my book, means thoughtful, not lame.  :)

> I should be able to get some feeling for it by today
> possibly 

Cool!  Please let us know as soon as you hear anything, one way or
another.  As a backup, I'll look through the list of wifi hotspots to
locate a site, should sfsu not be available for this meeting.

Any list membes know of a cafe, or public space, (library? school?) w/
wifi that could likely accomodate a meeting this fri pm?

> and I figured a "no" or "yes" would be better than a "we'll
> see". I personally hate lame equivocation.
> 
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 11:09:42PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 23:18:29 -0700, "Michael Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > > 
> > > Working on it. I'll get back to you if it comes through on this short
> > > notice. 
> > 
> > Thanks!  Would you please send the above message/reply to the list, so
> > that the list members can follow our progress on this, & perhaps they
> > might also give us some suggestions & help.  :)
> > 
> > Thanks!

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - And now for something completely different�
--
general wireless list, a bawug thing <http://www.bawug.org/>
[un]subscribe: http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to