Dan Lanciani writes:
 > Sure.  They could pretend to be an STA for each MAC device they wanted to
 > support.  There's nothing to prevent one physical radio from implementing
 > multiple "virtual" STAs.  I've wondered for a long time why nobody does
 > this.  I suspect the reason is that all the bridge-like widgets use more-
 > or-less standard firmware on the radio card and that will not allow for
 > such an approach.

Certification.  Blah.

-- 
--My blog is at angry-economist.russnelson.com  | I'm giving a short
Crynwr sells support for free software  | PGPok | talk at WTF, Isen's
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | stupid net conference:
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213  | FWD# 404529 via VOIP  | http://stupidnet.com
_______________________________________________
BAWUG's general wireless chat mailing list
[unsubscribe] http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to