Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|Dan Lanciani writes:
| > |Certification. Blah.
| >
| > Meaning what exactly? Are you suggesting that implementing multiple STAs
| > with one radio violates some WiFi standards rule?
|
|No, that *changing* the firmware in a radio that's at all
|software-defined requires re-certification.
Really? I thought that only if you initially certified as a software-defined
radio did you need to do anything special about new firmware. And then it's
"just" a permissive change. I assume that most of the cards we know and love
have not been re-classified as SDRs. Of course, I still don't understand why
people claim that SDR certification makes life easier for manufacturers. They
say that permissive changes are easy to file, but with a non-SDR certification
you didn't have to file anything to change the firmware...
Dan Lanciani
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
BAWUG's general wireless chat mailing list
[unsubscribe] http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
