Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|Dan Lanciani writes:
| > Sure. They could pretend to be an STA for each MAC device they wanted to
| > support. There's nothing to prevent one physical radio from implementing
| > multiple "virtual" STAs. I've wondered for a long time why nobody does
| > this. I suspect the reason is that all the bridge-like widgets use more-
| > or-less standard firmware on the radio card and that will not allow for
| > such an approach.
|
|Certification. Blah.
Meaning what exactly? Are you suggesting that implementing multiple STAs
with one radio violates some WiFi standards rule?
Dan Lanciani
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
BAWUG's general wireless chat mailing list
[unsubscribe] http://lists.bawug.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
