Mine was also removed. I think that it was because in my first filing I didn't check the 'late-filed' box and I didn't change it from "COMMENT" to "STATEMENT FOR THE RECORD."
The moral of the story is: keep a copy of anything that you send to the government. Fortunately, I did and re-submitted it with the correct information. Thanks for the heads-up, George! Everyone who thought they filed should check to see if your filing is still there: http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/websql/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.hts?ws_mode=retrieve_list&id_proceeding=04-186&start=1&end=2000&first_time=N - Tony P.S. I just noticed that most of the other filings after 1/1/05 are marked as "Document Type: NOTICE" and not "STATEMENT" or "STATEMENT FOR THE RECORD" Is it possible that statements are being erased as well? I filed one copy as a "STATEMENT" and another as a "STATEMENT FOR THE RECORD" and both have identical information in the search results. Should we be filing "notices" instead? On 10/4/2005 10:29 AM, George created: > Funny thing is I filled this one out. > I could have sworn there was like 295 responses the next day after we > sent this to the various lists and now there is only 242 responses and > my response can not be found. > Anyone else notice this and does anyone else see their response missing? > > George > > > John Scrivner wrote: > >> I just wanted to say thank you to all who are sending a clear message >> to the new FCC about the stalled ruling for access to unused >> television channel space. Your messages are going to be heard. 04-186 >> is key to the future growth of our industry. We face huge opposition >> from the NAB (National Association of Broadcasters) who do not want >> anyone else playing in their sandbox. If you have not already told the >> FCC that you need those unused television channels to help grow your >> business and serve those hard to reach customers then please do so >> now. Here are the instructions once again: >> >> GO RIGHT NOW TO: >> http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi >> >> A from will appear magically in your web browser. Fill in the blanks >> with your contact information. Use the guide below for specific lines >> to help you with items you may not know how to fill in correctly. >> >> 1) Where it says "Proceeding" type in 04-186 >> 2) For the "Mail Correspondence to" line click on "Name". >> 4) and 5) Leave Blank >> 11) Check "Late Filed" check box. >> 12) Select the drop down for "Statement for the Record" >> >> The other lines not listed above are things like your name which I >> will assume you guys have covered. :-) >> >> Then type your comments about why you need those TV channels for >> broadband. Give good reasons and do not argue with the FCC. Just tell >> them why you need the channels. Use good grammar, use correct >> spelling, be as good a writer as you can even if it is only one >> sentence. I want to see 500 comments from the WISP industry on this >> NPRM over the next 5 days. Let's bury them in so many comments in >> support of this NPRM that the FCC cannot deny us this ruling. >> >> Thanks guys, >> Scriv >> >> PS. I am not on any other list servers so feel free to pass this on if >> you are. > > -- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
