I am also seeing only 240 and the two filings that I posted today are missing... in fact, I only see one filing from 10/4 and I know that there were at least 4 there earlier.
My filing a few days ago that was missing this morning appears to have re-appeared as well. Something strange is going on. Anyone know their webmaster and can tell us what's up? - Tony On 10/4/2005 4:22 PM, John Scrivner created: > Well maybe I am wrong. Now I am only seeing 240 comments. This is after > I dumped cache. I am not sure what is wrong here now. > Scriv > > > George wrote: > >> Funny thing is I filled this one out. >> I could have sworn there was like 295 responses the next day after we >> sent this to the various lists and now there is only 242 responses and >> my response can not be found. >> Anyone else notice this and does anyone else see their response missing? >> >> George >> >> >> John Scrivner wrote: >> >>> I just wanted to say thank you to all who are sending a clear message >>> to the new FCC about the stalled ruling for access to unused >>> television channel space. Your messages are going to be heard. >>> 04-186 is key to the future growth of our industry. We face huge >>> opposition from the NAB (National Association of Broadcasters) who do >>> not want anyone else playing in their sandbox. If you have not >>> already told the FCC that you need those unused television channels >>> to help grow your business and serve those hard to reach customers >>> then please do so now. Here are the instructions once again: >>> >>> GO RIGHT NOW TO: >>> http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi >>> >>> A from will appear magically in your web browser. Fill in the blanks >>> with your contact information. Use the guide below for specific lines >>> to help you with items you may not know how to fill in correctly. >>> >>> 1) Where it says "Proceeding" type in 04-186 >>> 2) For the "Mail Correspondence to" line click on "Name". >>> 4) and 5) Leave Blank >>> 11) Check "Late Filed" check box. >>> 12) Select the drop down for "Statement for the Record" >>> >>> The other lines not listed above are things like your name which I >>> will assume you guys have covered. :-) >>> >>> Then type your comments about why you need those TV channels for >>> broadband. Give good reasons and do not argue with the FCC. Just tell >>> them why you need the channels. Use good grammar, use correct >>> spelling, be as good a writer as you can even if it is only one >>> sentence. I want to see 500 comments from the WISP industry on this >>> NPRM over the next 5 days. Let's bury them in so many comments in >>> support of this NPRM that the FCC cannot deny us this ruling. >>> >>> Thanks guys, >>> Scriv >>> >>> PS. I am not on any other list servers so feel free to pass this on >>> if you are. >> >> >> -- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
