agreed, VL is far from carrier grade
On Apr 12, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Charles Wu wrote:
<snip>
Motorola designed Canopy specifically for the WISP market, not the
carrier market.
Alvarion designed VL specifically for the carrier market, not the WISP
market.
</snip>
Ah, the "mis-perceptions" of the "rugged" metal enclosure =)
Steve, can you please explain why carriers would prefer a CSMA/CA
over a
scheduled (WiMAX-like) MAC?
Thanks
-Charles
-------------------------------------------
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:wireless-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steve Stroh
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 11:05 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Best system for a new WISP
Thanks,
Steve
On Apr 11, 2006, at 18:55, Dylan Oliver wrote:
How is any product qualified as 'Carrier-Grade'? What is it about
Alvarion VL that makes the cut vs. Canopy? Lord knows Motorola
produces far more 'Carrier-Grade' equipment than Alvarion ever will -
so where did they go wrong with Canopy?
Also, I've heard lately several complaints that Waverider has
trouble
sustaining even 1 Mbps throughput ... what is your experience, John?
Best,
--
Dylan Oliver
Primaverity, LLC--
---
Steve Stroh
425-939-0076 | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.stevestroh.com
--
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/
wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
