Why is it politically correct for a Appliance vendor to charge for
accelleration, and not an ISP, from a Net Neutrality perspective?
As WISPs, shouldn't we be charging Microsoft, Google, and Yahoo, a price for
offering cached services (on-net) to them, and reducing their bandwidth use
of their broadband connections and improving their user's experiences on
your network?
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
----- Original Message -----
From: "Travis Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2006 9:27 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] bits per mbps
Hi,
We've had one for almost 5 years now... but there isn't anything to "play
with". They ship you three 1u servers and a Cisco switch. You plug
everything in and turn it on. They do all the admin, config, setup, etc.
and don't allow you access whatsoever.
But it does work great. Microsoft updates come VERY fast (over 10Mbps
speeds) and many other sites are just as fast. However, I have no idea who
to contact, as we were approached by them.
Travis
Microserv
David E. Smith wrote:
George Rogato wrote:
You know Akamai is also an option. As I recall they require you to have
x number of subs and then send you their boxes to be set up on your
network. All free.
Any idea on how many subs you need before this becomes an option? I've
heard that Akamai will do this, and I love having new toys in my NOC to
play with, but I've never been able to find out just how you go about
getting one.
David Smith
MVN.net
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/