Oh yeah, one hop is 6.5 miles so 5.3/5.4 is out unfortunately. The other is 0.5 miles so I will probably run that in 5.3. There are a lot of weather radar towers around here that junk up 5.4.
Patrick Shoemaker President, Vector Data Systems LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] office: (301) 358-1690 x36 mobile: (410) 991-5791 http://www.vectordatasystems.com Randy Cosby wrote: > I've had some limited experience with them, and so far all is good. I'm > using 5.4 channels, which is an added bonus for dealing with noisy > canopy stuff. Fairly short hops though. > > > Patrick Shoemaker wrote: >> I have two Motorola Canopy 20M backhauls running in 2.4 GHz that serve >> as redundant links between POPs. I am located in Maryland just outside >> of DC, and the 2.4 noise floor has crept high enough to require >> replacement of these backup links. I am looking at the TrangoLINK-45 >> radios to replace these and wanted to get some real-world feedback from >> anyone who is using this system. Any problems / bugs / known issues? >> >> They will be colocated with Orthogon PtP radios as well as some Canopy >> APs, which are all running in 5.7. The Canopy APs and Orthogon get along >> great together running in the same band- am I wrong assuming the Trango >> product will have good enough receiver selectivity to get along with the >> other equipment too? It will likely be run H-pol with the other stuff on >> v-pol (except the Orthogon which uses both polarities via MIMO). Thanks, >> >> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
