I did not think you could legally run 3 foot parabolics in 5.3./ 5.4. Are there 3 foot dishes FCC certified with radios in 5.3 / 5.4? I would like to see a URL to data on these radio / antenna combinations. I had always believed the lower power limits of those bands pretty much meant they were only worth using in 2 or 3 mile shots. Please enlighten me. Scriv
On Feb 19, 2008 3:17 PM, Mike Hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You can go 10 - 15 miles within EIRP in 5.3\5.4 in a PtP configuration. I > believe 10 miles is with a 3' dish. > > > ---------- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Patrick Shoemaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 3:09 PM > Subject: Re: [WISPA] TrangoLINK-45 > > > > Oh yeah, one hop is 6.5 miles so 5.3/5.4 is out unfortunately. > > > > The other is 0.5 miles so I will probably run that in 5.3. There are a > > lot of weather radar towers around here that junk up 5.4. > > > > Patrick Shoemaker > > President, Vector Data Systems LLC > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > office: (301) 358-1690 x36 > > mobile: (410) 991-5791 > > http://www.vectordatasystems.com > > > > > > Randy Cosby wrote: > >> I've had some limited experience with them, and so far all is good. I'm > >> using 5.4 channels, which is an added bonus for dealing with noisy > >> canopy stuff. Fairly short hops though. > >> > >> > >> Patrick Shoemaker wrote: > >>> I have two Motorola Canopy 20M backhauls running in 2.4 GHz that serve > >>> as redundant links between POPs. I am located in Maryland just outside > >>> of DC, and the 2.4 noise floor has crept high enough to require > >>> replacement of these backup links. I am looking at the TrangoLINK-45 > >>> radios to replace these and wanted to get some real-world feedback from > >>> anyone who is using this system. Any problems / bugs / known issues? > >>> > >>> They will be colocated with Orthogon PtP radios as well as some Canopy > >>> APs, which are all running in 5.7. The Canopy APs and Orthogon get along > >>> great together running in the same band- am I wrong assuming the Trango > >>> product will have good enough receiver selectivity to get along with the > >>> other equipment too? It will likely be run H-pol with the other stuff on > >>> v-pol (except the Orthogon which uses both polarities via MIMO). Thanks, > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > > http://signup.wispa.org/ > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] > > > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
