I've had some limited experience with them, and so far all is good. I'm using 5.4 channels, which is an added bonus for dealing with noisy canopy stuff. Fairly short hops though.
Patrick Shoemaker wrote: > I have two Motorola Canopy 20M backhauls running in 2.4 GHz that serve > as redundant links between POPs. I am located in Maryland just outside > of DC, and the 2.4 noise floor has crept high enough to require > replacement of these backup links. I am looking at the TrangoLINK-45 > radios to replace these and wanted to get some real-world feedback from > anyone who is using this system. Any problems / bugs / known issues? > > They will be colocated with Orthogon PtP radios as well as some Canopy > APs, which are all running in 5.7. The Canopy APs and Orthogon get along > great together running in the same band- am I wrong assuming the Trango > product will have good enough receiver selectivity to get along with the > other equipment too? It will likely be run H-pol with the other stuff on > v-pol (except the Orthogon which uses both polarities via MIMO). Thanks, > > -- Randy Cosby Vice President InfoWest, Inc office: 435-773-6071 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
