I'm not 100% I always use my Procurve switches for the VLAN and leave the
Trango as a dummy bridge.

Cameron
Midcoast Internet

> After running the numbers, it does look like I can get some decent
> throughput out of this thing in 5.3 using the integrated antennas at 6.5
> miles. Certainly better than the Canopy BH I'm using now.
>
> Another question: the sales page for the TrangoLINK-45 says it's VLAN
> aware, but there's no mention of VLAN configuration in the user manual.
> Is it possible to assign a VLAN to the management interface of these
> radios?
>
> Patrick Shoemaker
> President, Vector Data Systems LLC
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> office: (301) 358-1690 x36
> mobile: (410) 991-5791
> http://www.vectordatasystems.com
>
>
> Mike Hammett wrote:
>> Responding to myself, I think the Orthogon can go to -7 and the Redline
>> to -20 just for this purpose.
>>
>>
>> ----------
>> Mike Hammett
>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Mike Hammett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 4:07 PM
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] TrangoLINK-45
>>
>>
>>> I have no documentation present, but people with Orthogon and Redline
>>> have
>>> said their products can use large antenna.
>>>
>>> In a PtMP environment, yes 2 - 3 miles is probably all you can get.
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "John Scrivner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 3:21 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] TrangoLINK-45
>>>
>>>
>>>> I did not think you could legally run 3 foot parabolics in 5.3./ 5.4.
>>>> Are there 3 foot dishes FCC certified with radios in 5.3 / 5.4? I
>>>> would like to see a URL to data on these radio / antenna combinations.
>>>> I had always believed the lower power limits of those bands pretty
>>>> much meant they were only worth using in 2 or 3 mile shots. Please
>>>> enlighten me.
>>>> Scriv
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 19, 2008 3:17 PM, Mike Hammett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> You can go 10 - 15 miles within EIRP in 5.3\5.4 in a PtP
>>>>> configuration.
>>>>> I
>>>>> believe 10 miles is with a 3' dish.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----------
>>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>>>>> http://www.ics-il.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "Patrick Shoemaker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]>
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 3:09 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] TrangoLINK-45
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh yeah, one hop is 6.5 miles so 5.3/5.4 is out unfortunately.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The other is 0.5 miles so I will probably run that in 5.3. There are
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> lot of weather radar towers around here that junk up 5.4.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Patrick Shoemaker
>>>>>> President, Vector Data Systems LLC
>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> office: (301) 358-1690 x36
>>>>>> mobile: (410) 991-5791
>>>>>> http://www.vectordatasystems.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Randy Cosby wrote:
>>>>>>> I've had some limited experience with them, and so far all is good.
>>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>>> using 5.4 channels, which is an added bonus for dealing with noisy
>>>>>>> canopy stuff.  Fairly short hops though.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Patrick Shoemaker wrote:
>>>>>>>> I have two Motorola Canopy 20M backhauls running in 2.4 GHz that
>>>>>>>> serve
>>>>>>>> as redundant links between POPs. I am located in Maryland just
>>>>>>>> outside
>>>>>>>> of DC, and the 2.4 noise floor has crept high enough to require
>>>>>>>> replacement of these backup links. I am looking at the
>>>>>>>> TrangoLINK-45
>>>>>>>> radios to replace these and wanted to get some real-world feedback
>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>> anyone who is using this system. Any problems / bugs / known
>>>>>>>> issues?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> They will be colocated with Orthogon PtP radios as well as some
>>>>>>>> Canopy
>>>>>>>> APs, which are all running in 5.7. The Canopy APs and Orthogon get
>>>>>>>> along
>>>>>>>> great together running in the same band- am I wrong assuming the
>>>>>>>> Trango
>>>>>>>> product will have good enough receiver selectivity to get along
>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> other equipment too? It will likely be run H-pol with the other
>>>>>>>> stuff
>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>> v-pol (except the Orthogon which uses both polarities via MIMO).
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>>>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>>>
>>>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>>>>
>>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>>
>>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>>>
>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to