Steve Barnes wrote: > Other way around (from what was stated from MT) Tranzeo did not follow > all the 802.11 protocol to the letter. Mikrotik in 3.15 came up with a > work around. I have 3.16 on 4 towers so far and works great with > Tranzeo. One has 40 Clients and some of them have been up for 45 days > without a reboot. > > My wish is that there was a standard where the Device name in Tranzeo > units would show up as the radio name on MT AP's. Guess that is what > you get with different vendors. > >
Thats why I use the same product for my cpe as the ap. I'm star so it's star both ends and it is like pulling teeth to convince me to use something else no matter how much cheaper. If your MT you should seriously consider only MT for your cpe's. Then you know the compatability issue will be rare. George -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
