OK, I've been putting some thought into this bailout mess we find ourselves 
in.

The agencies have almost no time to design a program, take applications, 
distribute money and audit the results.

I'll be surprised if they aren't forced to accept a basic outline of a plan 
drawn on a Denny's napkin.

What will the easiest and safest way to go as a government employee?  Just 
shoot most of the money out to the people that you already know.  Even 
though you've already sent 6 billion out the door to that same group (BTW, 
we should use that number as a big reason why they should radically change 
their models).  No one will get in trouble for sticking with what's known, 
and there's not nearly enough time to study the issue, accept public input 
etc. etc. etc.

I don't know if we'll ever get the chance to give our input to the agencies 
involved.  (I know WISPA and many of us individually will sure be working on 
that though!!!)  But if we do, what should we push for?  The more of us push 
in the same direction the more we'll be able to move the agencies out of 
their historic ruts.

Some of the things that I think would help a company like mine deal with the 
grants.  Heck, even want the grants.  (The last time I even considered one 
was in 2001, too many strings.)

    No strings attached.  Accept the plan laid out, look at the goals of the 
plan and approve or disapprove based on that.  (We need more and better 
broadband out here, but we do NOT need computer centers!)

    Allow basic plans.  There isn't time for us to figure this out down to 
the last nut and bolt either.  I have a plan to build new towers in many 
locations.  Some will be near existing buildings that are used for towers 
now, others will have to be in totally new locations.  It'll take time to 
buy/lease ground.  I might have to move my locations by great distances.

    Allow labor to be paid.  If I can grow/update my network I'll need to 
hire some help.  I won't be able to do enough new installs or upgrades to 
get it all done quickly.

    Fund small businesses at 100%.  If I had the ability to get more money 
(for matching funds) I'd have already used it to deploy more coverage to 
more users.

    Allow funding to purchase the tools needed to expand.  If I get another 
installation crew running I'll need a rig for them.  They'll need some 
training etc.

    Allow the specifics of a deployment to change if need be.  As long as 
the original goal is still being met.

    Money will need to be sent out in advance.  Lets say that a company gets 
a $1m grant.  They need $100k to $200k in the bank at all times.  This will 
allow is to get cash with order deals, adjust for changing opportunities 
etc.  We'll also be able to move MUCH more quickly than we otherwise would.

    Tie grant funds to the 477.  If a company can prove that it's already 
been in the broadband industry and has already been serving customers they 
should be empowered to do more of what they already do.  They'd have the 
greatest chance of success over the long haul.

    Do NOT fund startups.  The Muni Wireless industry's pitiful results 
should demonstrate that most of the "big thinkers" just don't get the 
market.  Let those that are already successful expand on what they are 
already able to accomplish.

    Make sure that most of the money goes to small business.  The goal here 
is to create jobs.  90%+ of America's economy revolves around small 
business.  Many more jobs will be created and the money used more 
efficiently (as seen in the historical record) by small businesses.

    Fund operations for x (3 to 5?) years.  We can build the networks today, 
but we can't create users today.  It will take time to sign them up.  It 
will take time for them to maximize their new efficiencies with the new 
technologies (or upgraded technologies) that we'll install.

What does the borg think?  How do we get in front of the agencies as they 
create their programs?  What do we ask for?  How do we justify it?

After talking to Steve Coran on Friday he thinks that we won't know ANYTHING 
about what we'll be able to do for a week or two yet.  Then who knows how 
long (or even if) we'll have to give our input and what input are they going 
to be willing to accept?

Personally I am far more stressed out by sitting here doing nothing than I 
am with the idea that I'll waste some time building a position that will 
have to be modified or tossed completely out.  I see more potential upside 
to have many of our wants, needs, and desires fleshed out ahead of time than 
I do in potential downside.  I don't have a lot of time available, but I do 
have little snippets here and there.  I don't have a problem doing some 
foundation work while I wait for my family to wake up on a Sat. morn.

laters,
marlon



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to