well thats interesting, but you didn't address the primary question of 
polarity.

Or what polarity hotspot CPE devices generally see.

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Charles Wyble" <char...@thewybles.com>
To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] WAN HotSpot and Polarity


>I found that with a NanoStation2 I was able to provide coverage to an
> entire strip mall. Google earth it:
>
>  229 Main Street
> El Segundo, CA 90245
>
> is where I deployed the AP.
>
> It's a fairly standard strip mall. I covered the entire mall, plus
> across the street in all 4 directions.
>
>
>
> Tom DeReggi wrote:
>> Over the years, there have been many theories and strategies regarding 
>> what
>> polarity is best to use for various purposes.
>> As an engineer, I as well have my theories. But, I wanted to get an 
>> updated
>> opinion based on field trials of others, for the following 
>> application....
>>
>> Application... 2.4Ghz WAN WIFI HotSpot
>> Specs...
>> 1) Average sub located within 100 yards to 1/2 mile.
>> 2) Find and Subscribe by "Search for available Networks", via laptop's 
>> WIFI
>> card.
>> 3) If RF signal good enough to get a web splash screen to user, will 
>> display
>> instruction for ordering higher gain antenna self-install kit for inside
>> their window mount or balcony.
>> 4) Access Point would likely use a sector panel (60 deg?), with an EIRP 
>> of
>> 36db.
>>
>> The goal here is.... enabling residential users to find the ISP's AP on
>> their own.
>>
>> So my questions are....
>>
>> 1. If a Horizontally polarized antenna is used at the AP, Is it likely 
>> the
>> consumer will equally be able to find your AP, compared to if it had been
>> verical pol'd?
>>
>> The idea being, horizontal pol's noise floor is much lower in the 
>> particular
>> area, and more likely ISP will avoid the noise from consumer APs that 
>> ship
>> with vert pol antennas, where end users by default will stick the 
>> antennas
>> straight up in Verticle pol position.
>>
>> 2. By the time the ISP's horizontal signal gets to the end user, is it
>> received in multiple polarities, based on all the reflections in end 
>> users
>> home and stuff?
>>
>> 3. Are laptop wifi cards typically "no polarity", and pick up Horizontal 
>> as
>> good as verticle signals?
>>
>> 4. Laptops would appear to have Horizontal pol antennas in some cases,
>> expecially if a PCMCIA card. Is this true?  Or are most laptops starting 
>> to
>> embed verticle pol antennas on the sides of screens?
>>
>> 5. Are End Users getting savy enough to move their laptop all around, 
>> when
>> they first take it out of the box, to try and find Horizontal pol APs of
>> ISPs Hotspots?
>>
>> In summary.... If doing Hotspot WAN deployment, and Verticle noise is
>> significantly higher, will an ISP be doing a smart thing putting their
>> sector on Horiz pol to avoid noise, or shooting themself in the foot 
>> because
>> they'll be sending a signal cross pol to the average end user's verticle
>> pol's Wifi card, taking a 20db hit off the bat?
>>
>> Sure.... Horizontal will be better, if the the consumer gets a 
>> professional
>> install, or learns to put an external horizontal pol antenna on their 
>> laptop
>> or PC. But most people may not know to do that, by default, for hotspot 
>> self
>> subscription.  (PS. recognize could use dual pol or 45deg off pol, but
>> purposely avoiding that, to try not to interfere with others, to enable 
>> more
>> people to play in the same spectrum)
>>
>> What have other's found?
>>
>> Tom DeReggi
>> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
>> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "George Rogato" <wi...@oregonfast.net>
>> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 8:27 PM
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] RB333/433 eliminating self-interference test
>>
>>
>>> Tom DeReggi wrote:
>>>> Good point but..... the problem went away when the mcpi cards each had
>>>> their own SBC/Case, this would infer card to card or pigtail to pigtail
>>>> interference, since in all cases the dummy load was outside the cases,
>>>> from what it sounds like.
>>>>
>>>> I guess that should be clarified....
>>>>
>>>> Kurt, when you tested with teh RB600 and 3 cards on the adjacent slots,
>>>> was the RB600 also in a case with the holes metal taped?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Tom DeReggi
>>>> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
>>>> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Question I have that should debunk that theory that cards in close
>>> proximity interfere with each other. Why do the cards not interfere with
>>> each other when there is additional gain antennas hooked on to them?
>>>
>>> You would think there would be even more self interference with high
>>> gain antennas than with no antennas....
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>>
>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>>
>>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to