The D standard does not include support for diversity, though nothing
technically prevents a company from making a D product that could
(except money!). Our position is just that is adds major CAPEX to the
build-out beyond the justification for most WISPs. Plus, there are
elements of E that WISPs would be better off without, especially the
built in techniques that increase latency and lower net capacity. In an
E deployment, you are literally paying for features that can work to
your detriment in our view.

I am very familiar with the theory the E users may someday benefit from
lower cost due to economies of scale. To that, I would politely say,
"What economies of scale?" LTE has won and a number of major telecom
vendors have already dropped E development entirely. And anyway, the
economies of scale, if any, are going to benefit 2.5 GHz users who have
hopes of obtaining USB dongles, cards and maybe even laptops with built
in WiMAX clients. Yay for them!...but that's not going to do a hill of
beans for 3.65 GHz users. Those users still require outdoor CPE where
much of the cost is embedded in the power amplification, just as happens
in a 2.5 GHz outdoor CPE.

You'll never see any cost benefits on the base station side of E from
any possible economies of scale -- there you can still expect to pay
maybe 2:1 or more for the same capacity as a D-based system. Which of
you are up for that? No many as far as I can see...not unless Uncle Sam
dumps big dollars into your lap.
 


Patrick Leary
Aperto Networks
813.426.4230 mobile

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 4:12 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Which WiMAX Are You?

Patrick,

Always great to see your list posts filled with good info. Responses
inline...

> The E standard does enable use of diversity, but it comes at a high 
> cost and is of limited benefit for rural operators. The truth is that 
> diversity is designed to increase link budgets to support
self-install.

Can you clarify? Are you saying D Spec does not support Diversity?
Or that most D vendors focusing on price chose not to include
implementation of it?

Even most Wifi chipsets supports diversity.

My understanding was D supported diversity, because the early Pre-Wimax
Aperto supported all types of Diversity.
Please clarify.

I'd like to add... I'd like to see more FIXED products support Diversity
at the AP.
Trials have shown that Polarity diversity yielded much better results
than Spacial diversity for NLOS. BUT, that data does not consider
spectrum availabilty and congestion.
Many Metro deployments can't afford to waste a polarity, with limited
spectrum and lots of noise, and forced to abandon the idea of Polarity
diversity.
Spacial Diversity at teh AP is an enhancement that can be used without
any trade-off other than Colo fees if can't avoid paying colo per
antenna.
Actually in newer MIMO designs Spacial Diversity on its own showed
signficant improvements in range.
This could becaome even more important in 3.65 with few channels.

> Basically, each standard has its place, E is for people in 2.5 GHz 
> doing self-install, like Clearwire, and we all know the low service 
> (especially low upstream) packages offered in Clearwire's service. D 
> is better and cheaper for rural fixed operators, and especially for 
> public safety video type networks and definitely for voice-centric 
> users. D is better for enterprise, where many users sit behind the 
> CPE. E is better for roaming individual users with modest
expectations.

I'd agree. And I'd agree "D" is most appropriate for most WISPs.

I think the biggest factor in deciding though isn't technology specs?
People want to pick the technology with the longest life span.
Many WISPs might prefer D, but are afraid D might be discontinued
sooner, since the big dollar might have followed E.
Just like is happening right now.
I think the number one factor that will lead WISPs to pick D is
acknowledgement that Vendors understand and see the long term potential
and MArket for D, so we can be confident about our vendors.
So far, I think the primary vendors have done a good job showing their
supprot for D.

The other number 1 barrier to WiMax is price, so once again many have
chosen D for price reasons.
But that is a fake benefit, because technically there is no reason that
E product couldn't be sold just as Cheap if it came down to it.
If anything, E has the potential to drop to lower prices, because of
economy of scale and diverse use for WiMax chipsets.

So what I'm saying is... Wimax E is killing themselves by pricing their
products to high. Right now D has the potential to regain its market
share because its price advantage.
However, one good way for E to protect its market share is to try and
influence the discontinuation of D.
Thus important to support the continued development of D.

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc

> We'd like to hear your opinions, and if you like to discuss this with 
> us while at 4G World, please drop me a note.
>
> Regards,
>
> Patrick Leary
> Aperto Networks
>
>
> Patrick Leary
> Aperto Networks
> 813.426.4230 mobile
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to