I absolutely agree with you Jack.
 
 

Faisal Imtiaz
Computer Office Solutions Inc. /SnappyDSL.net
Ph: (305) 663-5518 x 232 

 

  _____  

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Jack Unger
Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 4:05 PM
To: WISPA Board Members List
Cc: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [Board] USF changes?


Having the Board agree to hire someone to help first-time filers sounds fine
to me but I'll only support helping first-time WISPA MEMBERS file. 

I'm getting real tired of all the WISP freeloaders out there who are willing
to take as much free stuff as WISPA members are willing to shell out for but
who are not willing to step up and support WISPA for the tiny sum of $250
per year.  <http://www.wispa.org/?page_id=1524>
<http://www.wispa.org/?page_id=1524>.

Jack Unger
WISPA Director 


Marlon K. Schafer wrote: 

Brian could not have said this better.



We have GOT to file the 477's these days.  Yes it's non of the government's 

business.  But they WILL act on what they learn.  What's better, getting 

shot in the foot or getting shot in the head?  Either way, the gun WILL go 

off.  As the Rush song says, "If you choose not to decide, you still have 

made a choice!"  I choose the foot :-).



Many of you here will remember some of us telling you that not filing will 

hurt us in the long run.  Now we've got $7B in "free" money floating around,


most if it headed for OUR back yards and to our COMPETITORs.



Like it or not, the government's only real measure of what's going on out 

there is the 477.  It sucks, but it's reality.



I'm going to suggest that the board look at hiring someone to help first 

time filers figure the process out.  If we can get another thousand or two 

WISPs to file the 477 it'll do amazing things for our credibility.  More 

than any lobbying efforts we could possibly put forth otherwise.



The next filing time line is the July-December 09 period, due sometime after


Jan 1st.  Even flooding the FCC with attempts to file will say a lot.



Thoughts?

marlon



----- Original Message ----- 

From: "Brian Webster"  <mailto:[email protected]>
<[email protected]>

To: "WISPA General List"  <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>

Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 11:28 AM

Subject: Re: [WISPA] USF changes?





  

    The problem as I see it is that we are arguing the chicken and the 

egg.

While I understand why a WISP would not necessarily want to disclose their

network footprint, it has become very obvious that not disclosing the

information has created more harmful situations (BTOP/BIP funding as one

example) than would have been lost by letting the information out. The

legislative climate and the rate of change on broadband policy is so rapid

today, that waiting for some incentive to provide the information, to me 

is

more risk than disclosing the information. The FCC is indeed in the 

process

of looking at some of the ideas you mention in your email. It's happening

TODAY and policy/opinion/legislation is being crafted based on information

they can get their hands on now or in the very near future. I have been

contacted by the FCC about mapping broadband on a granular level and in

those conversations, USF reform was mentioned as one of the uses for the

mapping information. They already have a major data analysis company under

contract doing the modeling and considerations for USF reforms. The 

mapping

information will be a HUGE input and factor in some of the answers they 

will

derive from their studies. Many of these answers will be formulated in the

next 6 months or less. Waiting for legislative efforts to create incentive

to provide the information will more than likely be too late for the WISP

industry.



    Creating this data and just giving it away is a huge burden on a WISP

no doubt, but competing with a rural telco who might be able, under USF

reforms, to get subsidies for their DSL lines as well as the voice lines

they get now, will certainly make it much tougher for a WISP to compete in 

a

rural market. Right now wireless enjoys a big advantage in the cost per

subscriber to deploy compared to others. The FCC knows this. They are also

dealing with a congress who is influenced by strong telco and cable lobby

groups. The WISP industry has none of that and what is worse, they have no

comprehensive data put together to help the FCC defend any position that

might give WISP's a stab at USF funding. If they have no hard data they 

have

a very difficult time rebutting any claims the the cable and telco 

industry

claim. Yet another good reason the WISP industry should be filing the Form

477 data





Thank You,

Brian Webster







On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Tom DeReggi 

 <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>wrote:



    

Brian,



I argue to push legislation to give benefit to providers to map their 

data,

so its a no brainer to cooperate.

A Map is not needed to suggest and conclude USF reform.

A Map is needed implemen new USF rules, such as tocollect USF funds, and

block recipients from collecting funds.



I hardly see the benefit in giving away to the coverage information 

without

first being given the benefit of giving it away.



The first step is get legislation to include broadband as eligible

recipients.

And step two is to get legislation to include that USF funds wont be 

given

to entities that are alread y served by wireless technology.

And Step3 is to get legislation to include what criteria considers an 

area

adequately served by wireless technology.

Or Step4 - to create the equivellent of a ILEC, for a wireless provider.

Shouldn't there be a WiLEC status? :-)



When Feds give us good reason to disclose our coverage, backed by passed

good legislation,  I assure you WISPs will be first in line to give it.



Have the feds tell usthey wont give grants to new entrants where there is

already a WISP, unless to that pre-existing WISP, and I assure you WISPs

will flood the info to you.

But with legislation like, WISP must serve 60% of an areas to disqualify

others, there is hardly a call to action to provide information. 

Providing

that information just makes it easier for other applicants to serve our

areas.



Tom DeReggi

RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc

IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband





----- Original Message -----

From: "Brian Webster"  <mailto:[email protected]>
<[email protected]>

To:  <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>; "WISPA General
List"  <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>

Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 1:42 PM

Subject: Re: [WISPA] USF changes?





      

The FCC understands it very well. The problem is that WISP's are not 

well

known as far as where, how many, and what speeds they serve......ever

wonder

why they have been pushing the Form 477? This yet another example of 

how

trying to stay under the Radar is going to come back and bite the

        

industry

      

in the butt. Who knows, if they do a good job of USF reform and a WISP 

is

in

a very rural area, they may be entitled to RECEIVE USF funds on a 

monthly

basis. But of course if we cannot quantify the WISP industry and/or 

show

        

a

      

good coverage area, the policy makers will have no choice but to make

decisions based on what they have in front of them for

information.....maybe

it's time to dust off the National WISP map again and do another push 

to

improve that.





Thank You,

Brian Webster







On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Scottie Arnett

 <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>wrote:



        

And they forgot all about the other ISP's out there. They are leaving 

it

up

to the telcos to supply the demand! Do they(The FCC) not understand 

that

other companies besides the telcos and cable companies offer Internet

access?



Scott



---------- Original Message ----------------------------------

From: RickG  <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]>

Reply-To: WISPA General List  <mailto:[email protected]>
<[email protected]>

Date:  Mon, 9 Nov 2009 23:49:39 -0500



          

Warning: "The bill also drew early praise from AT&T"



On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Blair Davis  <mailto:[email protected]>
<[email protected]> 

wrote:



            

              

http://www.internetnews.com/infra/article.php/3847366/Lawmakers+Float+Bill+t
o+Boost+Rural+Broadband.htm

      

I'm not sure I need any more gov. interference!











              

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

      

WISPA Wants You! Join today!

http://signup.wispa.org/





              

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

      

WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]



Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



              

            

          

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

        

WISPA Wants You! Join today!

http://signup.wispa.org/

            

          

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

        

WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]



Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

---

[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]





            

Wireless High Speed Broadband service from Info-Ed, Inc. as low as

$30.00/mth.

Check out www.info-ed.com/wireless.html for information.









          

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

      

WISPA Wants You! Join today!

http://signup.wispa.org/





          

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

      

WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]



Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



          



        

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

      

WISPA Wants You! Join today!

http://signup.wispa.org/



        

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

      

WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]



Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

        





----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

WISPA Wants You! Join today!

http://signup.wispa.org/



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----



WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]



Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



      

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

WISPA Wants You! Join today!

http://signup.wispa.org/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----



WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]



Subscribe/Unsubscribe:

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 

    



_______________________________________________

Board mailing list

[email protected]

http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/board





  


-- 

Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.

Author - "Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs"

Serving the Broadband Wireless Industry Since 1993

www.ask-wi.com  818-227-4220  [email protected]



Sent from my Pizzicato PluckString...








--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to