On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Randy Cosby <dco...@infowest.com> wrote: > Thanks. Now, on the Motorola 320, for example, the ASN gateway is not > part of the picture, correct?
According ot its specs, no ASN gateway is required: "Low Cost Infrastructure The CAP 320 does not require ASN gateways or specialized CSN servers. The system efficiently runs over a wireless backhaul by performing local peer-to-peer routing at the base station." http://www.motorola.com/staticfiles/Business/Products/Wireless%20Networks/Wireless%20Broadband%20Networks/Point%20to%20Multi-point%20Networks/Canopy%20Products/PMP_320_Series/WB_CAP%20320_Specification%20Sheet.pdf?localeId=33 The Motorola 16e APs I've tested required an ASN gateway but they indeed mentioned they were working on not having it as a requirement. It's probably good though that a base station could be configured to use an ASN gateway, flexibility is never too much (unless it increases pricing... :-). Rubens -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
