In-line ...
A Couple questions..... 3. Is there something wrong or more encombersome with Bands 1-X (7?), that we dont know about or do know about? We know the size of radiators in the lower portion would be greater. However, lower frequencies propagate better, and a half wave element shows a higher voltage than the voltage at higher frequencies, so gain tradeoffs are partially negated. 5. How will our Antenna size requirements vary for this portion of the band? Each "segment" would have to have a radiator designed for that segment -- optimally. I guess my point is.... What do we as WISPs really think about the VHF ch 1-X (7?) compared to the other portions of the Whitespace band? I'd much rather have 300 MHz, 500 MHz or higher, but in rural areas, lower frequencies would work quite well in my opinion. If the FCC is hypothetically putting the lower bands out there, what do we want to do about it? Reach for the ring and don't look back! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: [email protected] Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
