Airmax is up to 5.2.beta8, legacy is up to 3.5.xxxrc something. ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> Reply-To: WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org> Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 17:30:39 -0400
>What is beta 8? > >I've never changed the ack timeouts. I've always used dynamic (MT APs >and NS2 CPEs). > >Josh Luthman >Office: 937-552-2340 >Direct: 937-552-2343 >1100 Wayne St >Suite 1337 >Troy, OH 45373 > >Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to >continue that counts. >--- Winston Churchill > > > >On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Robert West <robert.w...@just-micro.com> >wrote: >> I've been doing Auto Ack since beta 8 came out and it seems to be setting it >> just right but I use UBNT for the AP as well. Before that I was setting >> them a little more than the center of the CPEs average distance with no >> issues. >> >> However, with the UBNT on both sides we can also set the AirMax priority so >> that the clients further out have lower priority thus the closer ones won't >> suffer. With the setting of the two it's been smooth. >> >> Bob- >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On >> Behalf Of Data Technology >> Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 4:54 PM >> To: WISPA General List >> Subject: [WISPA] ack settings >> >> I have MT for access points and mostly UBNT for client units. >> >> Just wondering about the proper way to set the ack on the CPE. I have >> always just set it for a little further than the customer on the UBNT >> side and left the MT side to dynamic. This was set differently for each >> customer. One might be set at 1 mile and one might be set at 5 miles. >> >> I read something the other day that said the ack should be set at the >> furtherest customer plus about 10%. I read this to mean that all >> customers should be set to the furtherest distance, is this correct? >> >> Also searching came up with the fact that the auto ack setting on UBNT >> is more of a problem that a help. >> >> Just looking for suggestions and input on how everyone is setting the >> client units. >> And do I leave the access point set to dynamic or should I set it >> statically as well? >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> ---- >> WISPA Wants You! Join today! >> http://signup.wispa.org/ >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> ---- >> >> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org >> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ >> >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> WISPA Wants You! Join today! >> http://signup.wispa.org/ >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org >> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ >> > > >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >WISPA Wants You! Join today! >http://signup.wispa.org/ >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > >Subscribe/Unsubscribe: >http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > ________________________________________________________________ Sent via the WebMail system at avolve.net -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
