Oops, typo corrected in 2nd line below (added the word "you").

On 10/14/2010 5:44 PM, Jack Unger wrote:
>    Hello Fred,
>
> Regarding "snarky insults" - a simple review of this email thread reveals that
> the only "snarky insults" are the ones that you contributed.
>
> Please review WISPA's mailing list policies 
> at<http://www.wispa.org/?page_id=9>.
>
> Regarding your "strong RF and regulatory background" I offer the following for
> your consideration.
>
> 1. Join WISPA. A quick review of WISPA's billing server did not return either
> your name or your domain name. Of course, if you are (or once you become) a
> WISPA Member then go to step 2 (below).
>
> 2. Join WISPA's FCC Committee and apply your expertise by working with WISPA's
> dedicated, FCC Committee Members who volunteer hundreds of hours of work to 
> keep
> abreast of wireless technology and who discuss, draft and file WISPA's FCC
> comments.
>
> Again, have a great day.
>
> jack
>
>
>
> On 10/14/2010 5:28 PM, Fred Goldstein wrote:
>> At 10/14/2010 08:16 PM, you wrote:
>>>     Fred,
>>>
>>> If you don't know how to use this then don't use it. Simple.
>> Making snarky insults doesn't answer the question.  Quite frankly I
>> have a pretty strong RF and regulatory background so it is not a good
>> idea to treat me like a dunce.  So I'll ask the question
>> differently.  Do I need to create a new petition or did you address
>> the up-the-hill WISP subscriber issue?
>>
>> I am looking at potential subscriber locations above 75m HAAT.  So I
>> want WISPs to be able to put a radio there.  I'm really confused at
>> what you're trying to do.  Do you really call subscriber units (I'm
>> imagining the TVWS version of a NanoStation) "receive only" (I
>> don't), or do you really only want receivers?  Which of course don't
>> fall under those rules anyway.
>>
>>> Thank-you for your opinion and have a good day.
>>>
>>> jack
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/14/2010 5:13 PM, Fred Goldstein wrote:
>>>> At 10/14/2010 06:35 PM, you wrote:
>>>>>      Fred,
>>>>>
>>>>> Sites with TVWS receiving equipment instead of TVWS base stations
>>>>> that transmit.
>>>> Yes, which is worth precisely zero to a WISP, since we need two-way
>>>> transceivers.  The only receive-only equipment is what goes with
>>>> wireless mics; the mics themselves are transmit only.
>>>>
>>>>> jack
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/14/2010 3:22 PM, Fred Goldstein wrote:
>>>>>> At 10/14/2010 06:12 PM, you wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Steve Coran (respresenting WISPA), Comsearch, Motorola and Spectrum
>>>>>>> Bridge met with Julius Knapp and others from the FCC OET office
>>>>>>> yesterday in regard to certain limiting factors in the TVWS
>>>>>>> Memorandum Report&     Order language.  Below is the Ex parte Filing
>>>>>>> that was made today.
>>>>>> Rick, when you guys said "to remove the HAAT restriction for
>>>>>> receive-only sites", did you really mean receive-only, or did you
>>>>>> mean the PtP subscriber (slave) station that talks to the "tower"?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am glad to see action this soon on the 76-meter issue, since it not
>>>>>> only impacts tower locations, but subscriber sites.
>>     --
>>     Fred Goldstein    k1io   fgoldstein "at" ionary.com
>>     ionary Consulting              http://www.ionary.com/
>>     +1 617 795 2701
>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
>> http://signup.wispa.org/
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]
>>
>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>>
>>

-- 
Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
Author - "Deploying License-Free Wireless Wide-Area Networks"
Serving the Broadband Wireless, Networking and Telecom Communities since 1993
www.ask-wi.com  818-227-4220  [email protected]






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: [email protected]

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to