In RouterOS you can disable IPv6 by uninstalling the IPv6 package. On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Fred Goldstein <fgoldst...@ionary.com>wrote:
> At 10/27/2012 10:18 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: > >IPv6-only networks aren't far out in ARIN land. Well, unless you > >like paying out of the nose for third party blocks. I'd say less > >than 5 years before you cannot obtain an IPv4 address in North > >America. Complete European and Asian access will require IPv6 soon > >as they're out of IPv4 already. > > > > I don't want to get into a flame war here, but suffice to say that > there is an opposing opinion. IPv6 is five years away from mass > adoption, but this statement is always true. > > IPv4 addresses will be used more efficiently. They will be > resold. There will be more NAT (which only breaks broken > applications). So they will always be available. What has ended is > the "homestead act" era of IPv4. Homesteads were free land given to > farmers. When they ran out, farming didn't stop; the land could be > resold. Same with IPv4. When it was a free resource, people squandered > it. > > I'm still looking to see how to totally turn off IPv6 in RouterOS, as > its being on by default scares me. It's essentially a giant back > door used primarily by hackers. > > > >----- > >Mike Hammett > >Intelligent Computing Solutions > >http://www.ics-il.com > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Scott Carullo" <sc...@brevardwireless.com> > >To: wireless@wispa.org > >Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2012 11:18:35 AM > >Subject: Re: [WISPA] [Ubnt_users] Is IPv6 ready? > > > > > >I'm fairly sure you can change the binding order to adjust this > >operation to suite your preference. (which one the computer tried first) > > > >I don't see IPv6 utilized in my real world until 5-10 years from > >now. We do provide some customers v6 routed address space and our > >entire network is routed and supports it, but thats because people > >like to play with it because its something new in the networking > >world they want to understand, not because anyone actually requires > >it. It does provide a small marketing bonus, for those that don't > >understand it - sounds good any way lol > > > >I see it as somewhat as a liability to my network, since there are > >sure to be bugs in its implementation and dual stack functionality. > >Just a fear I have, been there done that with different routing > >protocols in the past and the programmers have not yet achieved > >perfection yet :) > > > >But, I flex, have to let people have their v6 fun (employees and > >customers alike...) > > > > > >Scott Carullo > >Technical Operations > >855-FLSPEED x102 > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Wireless mailing list > >Wireless@wispa.org > >http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > >_______________________________________________ > >Wireless mailing list > >Wireless@wispa.org > >http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > -- > Fred Goldstein k1io fgoldstein "at" ionary.com > ionary Consulting http://www.ionary.com/ > +1 617 795 2701 > > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > Wireless@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >
_______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
