Funny (or not depending upon your point of view ) thing is that the best results for throughput/penetration with 900Mhz was with the original SR9's from UBNT. Better throughput by 2-3x than XR9 but less interference resistance but being able to run smaller channels with the same throughput made up for that. All that was from before 900 rollout from the utilities and the 900 band turning into complete junk when the power meters do updates and other heavy usage.. We tried the other UBNT gear with not nearly the same results, but with and without external antennas.
On 08/22/2013 07:20 AM, Josh Luthman wrote: > Ubnt 900 apparently has extremely poor nlos for 900 MHz. I've heard > this a handful of people but haven't tried it myself. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> > wrote: >> How is it junk? IIRC, everyone I've asked that claimed a given 900 MHz >> system was junk had a poor RF environment. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> ________________________________ >> From: "Erik Anderson" <[email protected]> >> To: "WISPA General List" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 8:49:55 AM >> >> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Latest trend for heavy wooded areas >> >> 98% of our terrain is heavily wooded. Ubiquiti 900 is junk (but their other >> products perform quite well when they can be used). Cambium 900 is better. >> Out limited experience with whitespace has been good. All of these >> technologies have very low bandwidth. >> >> On 8/22/2013 12:04 AM, Chris Fabien wrote: >> >> What are you guys deploying lately in heavily wooded areas? We've used both >> Cambium pmp320 Wimax and UBNT M900, with mixed results on both. We just put >> up a 130ft tower in a heavily wooded river valley area, leaning towards the >> UBNT solution but hate putting money into something I'm not really satisfied >> with. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireless mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless >> > _______________________________________________ > Wireless mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
